- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:24, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Jared Flood
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jared Flood ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page was speedily deleted recently on the proposal of Androsyn ( talk · contribs). But it has survived for four years so I think it deserves a discussion here. My !vote is to say: delete: distinct lack of online references. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 19:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
My !vote is delete, lack of references and general lack of notability. Androsyn ( talk) 20:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete even if the gent has in-bubble notability, I'm afraid he does not appear notable enough for an article. - Roxy, the dog. barcus 12:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
There are nearly eight million worldwide users of handknitting's most popular website, Ravelry.com. How big does a bubble need to be for its community to deserve recognition on Wikipedia? For a subject of similar relevance with an unchallenged page, please see
/info/en/?search=Norah_Gaughan
K3tog —Preceding
undated comment added 16:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
*Delete Lol there's a difference between notability of a hobbyist community and that of a individual in it. This article reads like it was written by someone who knows him personally. I'd suggest and afd for that linked article too. Weak Delete I found a
decent interview of him on a blog-type site, but all sorts of small business owners get some coverage but don't meet the criteria of being notable.
Reywas92
Talk
19:47, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I checked newspapers.com, and there are a few mentions but only in passing. When he gets more substantive mentions, well, he may be Notable enough for an article. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 19:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:24, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Jared Flood
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jared Flood ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page was speedily deleted recently on the proposal of Androsyn ( talk · contribs). But it has survived for four years so I think it deserves a discussion here. My !vote is to say: delete: distinct lack of online references. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 19:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
My !vote is delete, lack of references and general lack of notability. Androsyn ( talk) 20:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete even if the gent has in-bubble notability, I'm afraid he does not appear notable enough for an article. - Roxy, the dog. barcus 12:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
There are nearly eight million worldwide users of handknitting's most popular website, Ravelry.com. How big does a bubble need to be for its community to deserve recognition on Wikipedia? For a subject of similar relevance with an unchallenged page, please see
/info/en/?search=Norah_Gaughan
K3tog —Preceding
undated comment added 16:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
*Delete Lol there's a difference between notability of a hobbyist community and that of a individual in it. This article reads like it was written by someone who knows him personally. I'd suggest and afd for that linked article too. Weak Delete I found a
decent interview of him on a blog-type site, but all sorts of small business owners get some coverage but don't meet the criteria of being notable.
Reywas92
Talk
19:47, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I checked newspapers.com, and there are a few mentions but only in passing. When he gets more substantive mentions, well, he may be Notable enough for an article. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 19:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.