The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment While around under another name for 10 years, their debut single as IRIS 13 seems to be mid-2020 and first album is apparently due mid-2021. Maybe draftify as
WP:TOOSOON?
LizardJr8 (
talk)
03:53, 18 November 2021 (UTC)reply
I'd rather not draftify, as it's unlikely the article will be viewed by our readers and will probably wind up getting deleted in six months time. I feel the sources are good enough to keep the article now.
NemesisAT (
talk)
09:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment They're is no secondary sources here. They changed their name because they were unsuccessful. They're completely non-notable. If there was any large successes on the horizon, it would have been immediately visible. But it is not. We are getting more and more of these bands that are cank, for a better word. Just completly mediocre. They have no standing. They is no fans (there is now sites guage fan numbers), no social media presence, no streaming on the main platforms. They are effectively a pub band and now because the marketing tool are relatively cheap, can keep marketing themselves for almost no money, that makes them feel as though they have a presence. But they are dont. They are mediocre and they only reason we record them here is due to them marketing themselves. Not the fans, as they don't exist. scope_creepTalk11:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - Non-notable sourcing galore presented in the article and I could not find any reliable secondary sources to even show this band qualifies for
WP:GNG.
Missvain (
talk)
23:08, 24 November 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment While around under another name for 10 years, their debut single as IRIS 13 seems to be mid-2020 and first album is apparently due mid-2021. Maybe draftify as
WP:TOOSOON?
LizardJr8 (
talk)
03:53, 18 November 2021 (UTC)reply
I'd rather not draftify, as it's unlikely the article will be viewed by our readers and will probably wind up getting deleted in six months time. I feel the sources are good enough to keep the article now.
NemesisAT (
talk)
09:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment They're is no secondary sources here. They changed their name because they were unsuccessful. They're completely non-notable. If there was any large successes on the horizon, it would have been immediately visible. But it is not. We are getting more and more of these bands that are cank, for a better word. Just completly mediocre. They have no standing. They is no fans (there is now sites guage fan numbers), no social media presence, no streaming on the main platforms. They are effectively a pub band and now because the marketing tool are relatively cheap, can keep marketing themselves for almost no money, that makes them feel as though they have a presence. But they are dont. They are mediocre and they only reason we record them here is due to them marketing themselves. Not the fans, as they don't exist. scope_creepTalk11:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - Non-notable sourcing galore presented in the article and I could not find any reliable secondary sources to even show this band qualifies for
WP:GNG.
Missvain (
talk)
23:08, 24 November 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.