- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to 2013 North Korean nuclear test. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- International reactions to the 2013 North Korean nuclear test ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is merely a list of quotes from politicians with little result on a minor event. Fail notability guidelines. Obi-Wan Kenobi ( talk) may the force be with you 21:24, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge. May or may not pass WP:GNG, but reactions to stuff like this is generally of little impact, since this wasn't really something that elicited great emotion. NK nuke tests happen often, unfortunately. epic genius ( talk) 21:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - WP:POINTY nomination per this. LjL ( talk) 21:49, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Not WP:POINTy, the notability is questioned by an editor as is the concept and content of these articles. It is right to seek community consensus rather than over-riding it and butchering articles in an underhand manner without consensus. AusLondonder ( talk) 22:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge In this particular case, this one is part of an ongoing issue with North Korea, and nuclear weapons. Merge this one with 2013 North Korean nuclear test. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 23:49, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. I previously wrote an essay at Wikipedia:Reactions to... articles aka WP:REACTIONS that describes some of the issues with these "International reactions" articles and lists some of the previous outcomes of debates around them. It is not intended as a guideline, but more a reflection of how editors have dealt with such articles before. That said, editors may be interested in extending the essay or working it into a guideline - perhaps a supplement to WP:EVENT. Fences& Windows 00:47, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge, no need for a stand alone article on that. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, it might be the last one since a later one was cancelled. If they're routine, they're not important 2601:600:8500:5B1:D41B:E837:1128:2F01 ( talk) 19:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge, this is little more than a thesaurus entry for "strongly condemned". Can easily be compiled into a single paragraph in 2013 North Korean nuclear test which details any specific actions stronger or more formal than voicing strong condemnation and summarising the rest into a blanket condemnation; breaking it out into individual similar quotes is adding no value. Aspirex ( talk) 05:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 16:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. LjL ( talk) 17:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect with 2013 North Korean nuclear test, per epic genius and Aspirex.-- Ddcm8991 ( talk) 17:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to 2013 North Korean nuclear test. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- International reactions to the 2013 North Korean nuclear test ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is merely a list of quotes from politicians with little result on a minor event. Fail notability guidelines. Obi-Wan Kenobi ( talk) may the force be with you 21:24, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge. May or may not pass WP:GNG, but reactions to stuff like this is generally of little impact, since this wasn't really something that elicited great emotion. NK nuke tests happen often, unfortunately. epic genius ( talk) 21:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - WP:POINTY nomination per this. LjL ( talk) 21:49, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Not WP:POINTy, the notability is questioned by an editor as is the concept and content of these articles. It is right to seek community consensus rather than over-riding it and butchering articles in an underhand manner without consensus. AusLondonder ( talk) 22:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge In this particular case, this one is part of an ongoing issue with North Korea, and nuclear weapons. Merge this one with 2013 North Korean nuclear test. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 23:49, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. I previously wrote an essay at Wikipedia:Reactions to... articles aka WP:REACTIONS that describes some of the issues with these "International reactions" articles and lists some of the previous outcomes of debates around them. It is not intended as a guideline, but more a reflection of how editors have dealt with such articles before. That said, editors may be interested in extending the essay or working it into a guideline - perhaps a supplement to WP:EVENT. Fences& Windows 00:47, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge, no need for a stand alone article on that. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, it might be the last one since a later one was cancelled. If they're routine, they're not important 2601:600:8500:5B1:D41B:E837:1128:2F01 ( talk) 19:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge, this is little more than a thesaurus entry for "strongly condemned". Can easily be compiled into a single paragraph in 2013 North Korean nuclear test which details any specific actions stronger or more formal than voicing strong condemnation and summarising the rest into a blanket condemnation; breaking it out into individual similar quotes is adding no value. Aspirex ( talk) 05:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 16:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. LjL ( talk) 17:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect with 2013 North Korean nuclear test, per epic genius and Aspirex.-- Ddcm8991 ( talk) 17:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.