The result was redirect to Incest in literature. Liz Read! Talk! 07:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The usual case of "list of random media that features this concept". Very poorly referenced (just four footnotes, two of them for the same exhibition), failing WP:NLIST as a list and WP:GNG as a general article. Perhaps this could be rewritten from scratch (last AfD from 2014 suggested some sources), but if so, WP:TNT applies (perhaps this could be stubbed with sources found back then?). Also, from the very lead: "Incest is a popular topic in English erotic fiction" - even the (unreferenced) lead is not usable, as most 'in popular culture' topics obviously exist outside of the English world (newsflash: there is non-English popculture too). To prove this p oint, the ja wiki corresponding article seems to have some referenced prose content that might be used to create a section in 'incest in Japanese popular culture' or 'incest in Japanese art' or such, but I cannot access/verify the references. (But I am tagging this AfD under Japan topics too, maybe this will be of use to someone). So bottom line is - nothing here is rescuable, the lead is incorrect and what follows is TV Tropes level OR. PS. Related AfDs: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incest in literature. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incest in film and television. Even if this is rescued (which would involve a total rewrite), I doubt there is anything in those mostly unreferenced lists of works that would be useful here. Any examples discussed in the body need to be acompanied by analysis, since per cited policies, Wikipedia articles should not be just lists of examples (and certainly we don't need three poorly referenced lists about the same topic). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Incest in literature. Liz Read! Talk! 07:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The usual case of "list of random media that features this concept". Very poorly referenced (just four footnotes, two of them for the same exhibition), failing WP:NLIST as a list and WP:GNG as a general article. Perhaps this could be rewritten from scratch (last AfD from 2014 suggested some sources), but if so, WP:TNT applies (perhaps this could be stubbed with sources found back then?). Also, from the very lead: "Incest is a popular topic in English erotic fiction" - even the (unreferenced) lead is not usable, as most 'in popular culture' topics obviously exist outside of the English world (newsflash: there is non-English popculture too). To prove this p oint, the ja wiki corresponding article seems to have some referenced prose content that might be used to create a section in 'incest in Japanese popular culture' or 'incest in Japanese art' or such, but I cannot access/verify the references. (But I am tagging this AfD under Japan topics too, maybe this will be of use to someone). So bottom line is - nothing here is rescuable, the lead is incorrect and what follows is TV Tropes level OR. PS. Related AfDs: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incest in literature. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incest in film and television. Even if this is rescued (which would involve a total rewrite), I doubt there is anything in those mostly unreferenced lists of works that would be useful here. Any examples discussed in the body need to be acompanied by analysis, since per cited policies, Wikipedia articles should not be just lists of examples (and certainly we don't need three poorly referenced lists about the same topic). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)