The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable historical figure. This article (and various Wikipedia mirrors) appear to be the only mention of this person to be found online. The
sole cited reference is an article about Persia in the late 19th century. If it mentions Igor of Teoco at all, it is likely only in passing as he is surely not the topic of the article. (The article is protected by a paywall, so I have been unable to read beyond the abstract.)
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete No satisfactory evidence this character existed, in history or legend.
Thincat (
talk) 21:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment Note that the article author has, since this nomination, proceeded to add several meaningless and unrelated references to the article. None of the new references mention "Igor of Teoco". This appears to be a clear case of reference padding for the sake of making the article look more legitimate.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete as "Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes"
174.3.125.23 (
talk) 06:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Can't find any reliable references for this.
Goblin Face (
talk) 23:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable historical figure. This article (and various Wikipedia mirrors) appear to be the only mention of this person to be found online. The
sole cited reference is an article about Persia in the late 19th century. If it mentions Igor of Teoco at all, it is likely only in passing as he is surely not the topic of the article. (The article is protected by a paywall, so I have been unable to read beyond the abstract.)
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete No satisfactory evidence this character existed, in history or legend.
Thincat (
talk) 21:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment Note that the article author has, since this nomination, proceeded to add several meaningless and unrelated references to the article. None of the new references mention "Igor of Teoco". This appears to be a clear case of reference padding for the sake of making the article look more legitimate.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete as "Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes"
174.3.125.23 (
talk) 06:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Can't find any reliable references for this.
Goblin Face (
talk) 23:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.