- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 13:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Hwamyeong LOTTE CASTLE KAISER
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hwamyeong LOTTE CASTLE KAISER ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It does not meet notability requirements & very promotional. James Richards ( talk) 08:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. James Richards ( talk) 08:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. James Richards ( talk) 08:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. James Richards ( talk) 08:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
I started Wikipedia few weeks ago and I happen to learn more about notability just today. I understand the problems with notability of this article, and agree on the deletion. But can you tell me what are the factors of being 'very promotional'? Just so I wouldn't make the same mistake further on. I re-checked the article but I still couldn't catch which part is problematic. GyongminM ( talk) 09:36, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery. All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources, so articles about very small garage bands or local companies are typically unacceptable. (
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion) --
James Richards (
talk)
09:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- @ Jamesrichards12345 and GyongminM: For the record, while I also agree with deletion due to notability issue, I want to note I do not see the article as suffering from any promotional language ( WP:WTA). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:59, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (places). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:04, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment In regards to the 'promotional content', my apologize, I added as I had the impression that this article was created by the developer of the property complex. My mistake/lack of knowledge I apologize.-- James Richards ( talk) 12:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Per Mr. Richards, Mr. Piotrus, and the fact that there are no reliable sources for this article. Koridas ( Speak) 03:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability. -- SalmanZ ( talk) 14:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Very thoughtful reasoning in the above comments. Woerich (talk) 06:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability -- Seems to be an advertisement also - AH ( talk) 12:38, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 13:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Hwamyeong LOTTE CASTLE KAISER
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hwamyeong LOTTE CASTLE KAISER ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It does not meet notability requirements & very promotional. James Richards ( talk) 08:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. James Richards ( talk) 08:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. James Richards ( talk) 08:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. James Richards ( talk) 08:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
I started Wikipedia few weeks ago and I happen to learn more about notability just today. I understand the problems with notability of this article, and agree on the deletion. But can you tell me what are the factors of being 'very promotional'? Just so I wouldn't make the same mistake further on. I re-checked the article but I still couldn't catch which part is problematic. GyongminM ( talk) 09:36, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery. All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources, so articles about very small garage bands or local companies are typically unacceptable. (
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion) --
James Richards (
talk)
09:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- @ Jamesrichards12345 and GyongminM: For the record, while I also agree with deletion due to notability issue, I want to note I do not see the article as suffering from any promotional language ( WP:WTA). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:59, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (places). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:04, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment In regards to the 'promotional content', my apologize, I added as I had the impression that this article was created by the developer of the property complex. My mistake/lack of knowledge I apologize.-- James Richards ( talk) 12:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Per Mr. Richards, Mr. Piotrus, and the fact that there are no reliable sources for this article. Koridas ( Speak) 03:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability. -- SalmanZ ( talk) 14:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Very thoughtful reasoning in the above comments. Woerich (talk) 06:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability -- Seems to be an advertisement also - AH ( talk) 12:38, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.