- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 17:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hutniki ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Mass-created article by Kotbot, a bot operated by retired user Kotniski.
As it says on the PL Wiki article, this is an "unofficial settlement" of the village of Przeborowo (nieoficjalna osady wsi Przeborowo). This is not listed on the TERYT database (despite the TERYT database being listed as the source...) nor is it listed on the Polish regulation of place-names.
Fails WP:GEOLAND since there is no legal recognition, nor evidence of an actual population. FOARP ( talk) 16:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland. FOARP ( talk) 16:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Not in TERYT. Article claims it is a "woodland area", so was this even a populated place, or just a name for some nearby forest (unofficial at that?). I nominated it for deletion on pl wiki (article there has different sources, but first one does not mention this entity, and I can't access the second one). Just in case, it may be good to wait till pl wiki discussion is closed and monitor it for arguments: pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2023:10:19:Hutniki. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Piotrus. Another bogus bot creation.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 17:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hutniki ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Mass-created article by Kotbot, a bot operated by retired user Kotniski.
As it says on the PL Wiki article, this is an "unofficial settlement" of the village of Przeborowo (nieoficjalna osady wsi Przeborowo). This is not listed on the TERYT database (despite the TERYT database being listed as the source...) nor is it listed on the Polish regulation of place-names.
Fails WP:GEOLAND since there is no legal recognition, nor evidence of an actual population. FOARP ( talk) 16:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland. FOARP ( talk) 16:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Not in TERYT. Article claims it is a "woodland area", so was this even a populated place, or just a name for some nearby forest (unofficial at that?). I nominated it for deletion on pl wiki (article there has different sources, but first one does not mention this entity, and I can't access the second one). Just in case, it may be good to wait till pl wiki discussion is closed and monitor it for arguments: pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2023:10:19:Hutniki. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Piotrus. Another bogus bot creation.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.