- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. No rationale given, no advocates for deletion. No prejudice against renomination iff new rationale is provided. Primefac ( talk) 16:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ho3ein ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikibijay1 ( talk) 17:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Wikibijay1 ( talk) 17:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- The article is translated from its Persian version.-- IMani → ( Talk) :) 17:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nominator has not advanced any argument for deletion, significant coverage in a piece by Radio France. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep on procedural grounds - No reasons for deletion are given in the nomination. The article was only 3 minutes old at the time of nomination therefore it's unlikely that the WP:BEFORE procedure had been carried out. -- John B123 ( talk) 19:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep and consider a
trout for the nominator. The nomination is probably for some sort of revenge.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
05:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- @ Robert McClenon:I agree with you,:) but we should not think about personal interests.For this reason, I did not object to the user We should think about the development of the encyclopedia, not about self-interest and hatred and self-interest.I do not know the purpose of the user, but my goal is to improve the encyclopedia.And I do not care about deleting my articles.I care about improving my knowledge and improving my writing. :)-- IMani → ( Talk) :) 05:39, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. No rationale given, no advocates for deletion. No prejudice against renomination iff new rationale is provided. Primefac ( talk) 16:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ho3ein ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikibijay1 ( talk) 17:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Wikibijay1 ( talk) 17:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- The article is translated from its Persian version.-- IMani → ( Talk) :) 17:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nominator has not advanced any argument for deletion, significant coverage in a piece by Radio France. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep on procedural grounds - No reasons for deletion are given in the nomination. The article was only 3 minutes old at the time of nomination therefore it's unlikely that the WP:BEFORE procedure had been carried out. -- John B123 ( talk) 19:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep and consider a
trout for the nominator. The nomination is probably for some sort of revenge.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
05:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- @ Robert McClenon:I agree with you,:) but we should not think about personal interests.For this reason, I did not object to the user We should think about the development of the encyclopedia, not about self-interest and hatred and self-interest.I do not know the purpose of the user, but my goal is to improve the encyclopedia.And I do not care about deleting my articles.I care about improving my knowledge and improving my writing. :)-- IMani → ( Talk) :) 05:39, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.