- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 14:57, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Harvey Sark
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Harvey Sark ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reviewed during new page patrol. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. "Participation only" content and the same for the one source, a database website. Article was sent to draft by others and then immediately moved back to mainspace. Editor immediately removed notability tag placed by another NPP'er. North8000 ( talk) 11:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, and Indiana. Shellwood ( talk) 11:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Uncontroversial fail of WP:GNG Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 14:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete this is a clear failure of GNG. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - More and better sources have been added to the page since its nomination. Hatman31 ( talk) 19:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, like 99%+ of the other National Football League players, Sark easily passes GNG. See here, here, here, here, here, etc. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 00:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, Beanie has improved the article significantly and it passes WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV now. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - per BeanieFan, especially since the sources available on newspaper.com from that vintage are likely only a small portion of the sources that actually existed at the time (but would be much harder to locate now). Rlendog ( talk) 15:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - NFL players who played in at least one NFL game are almost sure to be notable, also the article has been improved recently. PlaceKickerEnthusiast ( talk) 00:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep given recent improvements. As stated above, NFL players are almost always notable.-- Mvqr ( talk) 10:55, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Snow Keep while the article was in terrible shape prior to this AFD, significant improvements have been made showing a clear pass of WP:GNG. Frank Anchor 14:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 14:57, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Harvey Sark
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Harvey Sark ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reviewed during new page patrol. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. "Participation only" content and the same for the one source, a database website. Article was sent to draft by others and then immediately moved back to mainspace. Editor immediately removed notability tag placed by another NPP'er. North8000 ( talk) 11:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, and Indiana. Shellwood ( talk) 11:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Uncontroversial fail of WP:GNG Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 14:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete this is a clear failure of GNG. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - More and better sources have been added to the page since its nomination. Hatman31 ( talk) 19:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, like 99%+ of the other National Football League players, Sark easily passes GNG. See here, here, here, here, here, etc. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 00:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, Beanie has improved the article significantly and it passes WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV now. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - per BeanieFan, especially since the sources available on newspaper.com from that vintage are likely only a small portion of the sources that actually existed at the time (but would be much harder to locate now). Rlendog ( talk) 15:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - NFL players who played in at least one NFL game are almost sure to be notable, also the article has been improved recently. PlaceKickerEnthusiast ( talk) 00:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep given recent improvements. As stated above, NFL players are almost always notable.-- Mvqr ( talk) 10:55, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Snow Keep while the article was in terrible shape prior to this AFD, significant improvements have been made showing a clear pass of WP:GNG. Frank Anchor 14:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.