- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Harlequin Brass Ensemble ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non notable music ensemble. Unreferenced with WP:BEFORE showing no evidence of any reliable sources. No edits to text since 2010. Most of the article explains the general concept of a 10-piece brass ensemble, which is not unique to this group. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - No compelling coverage. Virtually no mention in the media other than conductor changes and additions to the ensemble. The ensemble seems to have one non-notable recording and that's about it. Sulfurboy ( talk) 03:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:49, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:49, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per the nominator and Sulfurboy, my research brings up the same lack of results theirs did. Thryduulf ( talk) 11:53, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as the article is very promotional to the extent that a speedy deletion G11 would be justified. No reliable sources in the article and I found no obvious rs on google and little coverage of any kind at this time, imv Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Harlequin Brass Ensemble ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non notable music ensemble. Unreferenced with WP:BEFORE showing no evidence of any reliable sources. No edits to text since 2010. Most of the article explains the general concept of a 10-piece brass ensemble, which is not unique to this group. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - No compelling coverage. Virtually no mention in the media other than conductor changes and additions to the ensemble. The ensemble seems to have one non-notable recording and that's about it. Sulfurboy ( talk) 03:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:49, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:49, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per the nominator and Sulfurboy, my research brings up the same lack of results theirs did. Thryduulf ( talk) 11:53, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as the article is very promotional to the extent that a speedy deletion G11 would be justified. No reliable sources in the article and I found no obvious rs on google and little coverage of any kind at this time, imv Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.