The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of
WP:SIGCOV. Fails
WP:BIO. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Promotional article, created by a
WP:SPA.
Edwardx (
talk) 13:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)reply
I'm not seeing substantial coverage of her or her work in reliable independent sources.
FloridaArmy (
talk) 14:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete I agree that the article fails
WP:BIO and
WP:GNG for lack of notability. I found many passing mentions, such as:
[1] and
[2]. And a few from what appeared to be reliable sources which were a bit more focused, such as:
[3] and
[4]. However, I did not find the breadth or number of mentions in reliable sources sufficient to meet
WP:SIGCOV. "Not yet," at best.
Geoff | Who, me? 18:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete The article is just a list of things she has done but fails to show any significance behind it.
Nottoohackneyed (
talk) 03:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of
WP:SIGCOV. Fails
WP:BIO. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Promotional article, created by a
WP:SPA.
Edwardx (
talk) 13:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)reply
I'm not seeing substantial coverage of her or her work in reliable independent sources.
FloridaArmy (
talk) 14:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete I agree that the article fails
WP:BIO and
WP:GNG for lack of notability. I found many passing mentions, such as:
[1] and
[2]. And a few from what appeared to be reliable sources which were a bit more focused, such as:
[3] and
[4]. However, I did not find the breadth or number of mentions in reliable sources sufficient to meet
WP:SIGCOV. "Not yet," at best.
Geoff | Who, me? 18:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete The article is just a list of things she has done but fails to show any significance behind it.
Nottoohackneyed (
talk) 03:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.