- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 12:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Halloweens ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NME has actually written about this collaboration twice, with another interview published in 2020. However, that's about it - no other coverage for what appears to be a relatively non-notable side project from two members of a notable group. "Written about non-trivially by multiple reliable sources." Fails WP:GNG; WP:BAND. Already amply covered, BTW, in The Vaccines' article. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:11, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and United Kingdom. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:11, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep (but expand and improve). They have indeed been discussed by NME twice: a short intro at [1] is already cited in the article, but they also have a much more robust feature piece at [2] (not currently cited). It appears that they got some reliable media notice because their sound is quite different than that of their full-time band. They have another reliable profile at [3] and various reviews and intros at [4], [5], [6], among others. The current state of the WP article does not reflect their media coverage thus far. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 14:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:27, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 12:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Halloweens ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NME has actually written about this collaboration twice, with another interview published in 2020. However, that's about it - no other coverage for what appears to be a relatively non-notable side project from two members of a notable group. "Written about non-trivially by multiple reliable sources." Fails WP:GNG; WP:BAND. Already amply covered, BTW, in The Vaccines' article. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:11, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and United Kingdom. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:11, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep (but expand and improve). They have indeed been discussed by NME twice: a short intro at [1] is already cited in the article, but they also have a much more robust feature piece at [2] (not currently cited). It appears that they got some reliable media notice because their sound is quite different than that of their full-time band. They have another reliable profile at [3] and various reviews and intros at [4], [5], [6], among others. The current state of the WP article does not reflect their media coverage thus far. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 14:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:27, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.