The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Technically the consensus is "weak keep" with most agreeing that though many of the sources are too poor to qualify, there is just sufficient to show notability
Nosebagbear (
talk)
22:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Piotrus: They aren't press releases. They were in the news section. Anime News Network files press releases in a separate section. The Fandom Post also doesn't do press releases at all. They are covering a press release. The article from Anime Nation is also sourced to the ANN article, so even if you want to call the ANN Articles press releases (which they are not), that one would count.
Link20XX (
talk)
10:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
I disagree. I actually read ANN often and I find a lot of their coverage is just press release reprints. Rewording them slightly is not 'covering the events'. Well, if it is, it is still such lowest denomnation journalism as to be of little use to us. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here11:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Isn't the entire point to covering a press release just to re-share the information presented in it? As far as I am aware, anyway. And anyway, I found the original source, and it doesn't appear to be a re-wording at all other than the main information.
Link20XX (
talk)
11:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep -- an article being a stub is not a valid reason for a deletion, and as others have posted above, plenty of sources exist.
matt91486 (
talk)
00:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak keep based on sources by Jumpytoo, it's not great but seems to meet the bare minimum GNG requires (two independent sources noticed this and discussed it, if briefly). Ping me if those sources are challenged or better ones are found. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here05:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
@
4meter4: "Just squeaks by", I provided 5 sources that are independent, reliable, and in-depth. I explained to Piotrus above why they are such. Do I need to repeat it?
Link20XX (
talk)
21:40, 13 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Technically the consensus is "weak keep" with most agreeing that though many of the sources are too poor to qualify, there is just sufficient to show notability
Nosebagbear (
talk)
22:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Piotrus: They aren't press releases. They were in the news section. Anime News Network files press releases in a separate section. The Fandom Post also doesn't do press releases at all. They are covering a press release. The article from Anime Nation is also sourced to the ANN article, so even if you want to call the ANN Articles press releases (which they are not), that one would count.
Link20XX (
talk)
10:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
I disagree. I actually read ANN often and I find a lot of their coverage is just press release reprints. Rewording them slightly is not 'covering the events'. Well, if it is, it is still such lowest denomnation journalism as to be of little use to us. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here11:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Isn't the entire point to covering a press release just to re-share the information presented in it? As far as I am aware, anyway. And anyway, I found the original source, and it doesn't appear to be a re-wording at all other than the main information.
Link20XX (
talk)
11:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep -- an article being a stub is not a valid reason for a deletion, and as others have posted above, plenty of sources exist.
matt91486 (
talk)
00:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak keep based on sources by Jumpytoo, it's not great but seems to meet the bare minimum GNG requires (two independent sources noticed this and discussed it, if briefly). Ping me if those sources are challenged or better ones are found. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here05:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
@
4meter4: "Just squeaks by", I provided 5 sources that are independent, reliable, and in-depth. I explained to Piotrus above why they are such. Do I need to repeat it?
Link20XX (
talk)
21:40, 13 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.