- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Godiva (band) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(...and by implication Godiva (album) and the redirect at Call Me Under 666)
This is a follow up to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryonic Temple, and is a pretty similar situation, but it gets complicated, so bear with me.
First, there's about two dozen notable things that share the name. So you end up with a search that looks something like this, until you narrow it down to basically nothing as far as news goes. If you switch to open web searches you get some apparent churnalism, passing mention, and very niche promotional interviews, with quaint plugs to remind you to check out their myspace page. And that's really the best of it in a search that pretty quickly wanders off into other topics.
None of the members appear to be independently notable. At first glance, it looks like they're sideways connected to other things that might be, but it's basically a giant almost entirely unreferenced walled garden, including their album, their label, their other label, and their producer.
It's possible that these are not actually overtly promotional, and just made by an over eager fan, but if a few of these go to the bin, probably looking toward a larger AfD at some point. Maybe there's something in German that I'm missing, but there's no article on de.wiki, so that doesn't make me hopeful. TJW talk 12:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Godiva (band) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(...and by implication Godiva (album) and the redirect at Call Me Under 666)
This is a follow up to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryonic Temple, and is a pretty similar situation, but it gets complicated, so bear with me.
First, there's about two dozen notable things that share the name. So you end up with a search that looks something like this, until you narrow it down to basically nothing as far as news goes. If you switch to open web searches you get some apparent churnalism, passing mention, and very niche promotional interviews, with quaint plugs to remind you to check out their myspace page. And that's really the best of it in a search that pretty quickly wanders off into other topics.
None of the members appear to be independently notable. At first glance, it looks like they're sideways connected to other things that might be, but it's basically a giant almost entirely unreferenced walled garden, including their album, their label, their other label, and their producer.
It's possible that these are not actually overtly promotional, and just made by an over eager fan, but if a few of these go to the bin, probably looking toward a larger AfD at some point. Maybe there's something in German that I'm missing, but there's no article on de.wiki, so that doesn't make me hopeful. TJW talk 12:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.