The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 00:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Seems to fail notability. While meticulously sourced, all the sources are fan-written - IMDb (twice (and spelled wrong)), about.me, and his own site. Nothing secondary. Also overly effusive while being as vague as possible.
JesseRafe (
talk) 14:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - Subject is not covered in secondary reliable sources, only self-published.
Meatsgains (
talk) 16:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as none of this suggests a better applicably notable article.
SwisterTwistertalk 04:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
You want to delete this article, yet Gilde Flores has mastered and licensed for some of the biggest names and organizations in TV, Internet, and Radio. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Eurocus47 (
talk •
contribs) 00:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete; blatantly non-notable. Doesn't get any clearer than this...
FoCuScontribs;
talk to me! 13:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 00:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Seems to fail notability. While meticulously sourced, all the sources are fan-written - IMDb (twice (and spelled wrong)), about.me, and his own site. Nothing secondary. Also overly effusive while being as vague as possible.
JesseRafe (
talk) 14:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - Subject is not covered in secondary reliable sources, only self-published.
Meatsgains (
talk) 16:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as none of this suggests a better applicably notable article.
SwisterTwistertalk 04:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
You want to delete this article, yet Gilde Flores has mastered and licensed for some of the biggest names and organizations in TV, Internet, and Radio. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Eurocus47 (
talk •
contribs) 00:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete; blatantly non-notable. Doesn't get any clearer than this...
FoCuScontribs;
talk to me! 13:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.