- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. under G5 and G11 by Ivanvector. (non-admin closure) – DreamRimmer ( talk) 15:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gaurishankaar Chaubey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. All of the sources are paid brand posts. This was previously created under the title Gaurishankar Chaubey and deleted under A7 and G5. I also want to note that this is likely a UPE/COI creation. – DreamRimmer ( talk) 05:04, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, India, and Uttar Pradesh. – DreamRimmer ( talk) 05:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom, also failed Wikipedia general notability guideline. Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 10:23, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Obviously promotional page which likely could be speedied; however, a check user should confirm this which would make it G5 eligible. Would also recommend salting for evasiveness and persistence of the sock farm involved. Won't be surprised when the IPs and SPAs start leaving keep !votes below. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 20:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. under G5 and G11 by Ivanvector. (non-admin closure) – DreamRimmer ( talk) 15:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gaurishankaar Chaubey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. All of the sources are paid brand posts. This was previously created under the title Gaurishankar Chaubey and deleted under A7 and G5. I also want to note that this is likely a UPE/COI creation. – DreamRimmer ( talk) 05:04, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, India, and Uttar Pradesh. – DreamRimmer ( talk) 05:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom, also failed Wikipedia general notability guideline. Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 10:23, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Obviously promotional page which likely could be speedied; however, a check user should confirm this which would make it G5 eligible. Would also recommend salting for evasiveness and persistence of the sock farm involved. Won't be surprised when the IPs and SPAs start leaving keep !votes below. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 20:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.