The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Owen×☎ 22:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: Ck references on his article in
ru.wp.
Curbon7 (
talk) 05:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. General who appears to have plenty of sourcing on Russian Wikipedia. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 12:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 03:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep based on the awards he received, unless some wants to argue that the ru.wiki sources are not adequate.
Mccapra (
talk) 06:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
If someone can fix the articles and give citations to them, then they should stay. But I don't speak the language, and the current article dosen't cite any sources, and I couldn't find any.
From
WP:NEXIST: "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article."
DoczillaOhhhhhh, no! 09:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Owen×☎ 22:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: Ck references on his article in
ru.wp.
Curbon7 (
talk) 05:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. General who appears to have plenty of sourcing on Russian Wikipedia. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 12:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 03:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep based on the awards he received, unless some wants to argue that the ru.wiki sources are not adequate.
Mccapra (
talk) 06:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
If someone can fix the articles and give citations to them, then they should stay. But I don't speak the language, and the current article dosen't cite any sources, and I couldn't find any.
From
WP:NEXIST: "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article."
DoczillaOhhhhhh, no! 09:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.