Saw this page and wanted to over look it not until almost all the source, possibly all fails to meet Wikipedia independent, reliable and secondary. No point calling him a musician when all the source are from promotion link and also fails in music notability. Since 2023 issue was tagged but no changes. Gabriel(talk to me )00:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: Coverage is looking sparse. These two sources might count towards GNG, although they do look low-quality:
[1][2]. I am unable to consistently access guardian.ng.
Helpful Raccoon (
talk)
03:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
I don’t see how those sources you provided meets GNG neither low quality. Meanwhile, i have never heard the word “Low quality” while determining either an article meets GNG or not. If it passes it passes. If doesn’t pass, it doesn’t. You can visit the article page. Check the tag to understand what reliable, independent source it’s all about. The two source you provided failed to be independent because it doesn’t speak from a disinterest of the article subject. Gabriel(talk to me )04:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
By "low-quality" I meant that the tone is
tabloid-style and the articles don't contain a lot of independent analysis. The sources use non-neutral language, but I don't see indications that they have a vested interest in the subject. If the articles were sponsored, for example, they would be completely non-independent, but there is no indication of that (unless there's something I'm missing about the sources). Per
WP:IIS, "Independence does not imply even-handedness. An independent source may hold a strongly positive or negative view of a topic or an idea."
Helpful Raccoon (
talk)
05:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The sources could also be non-independent if the coverage is almost entirely based on the subject's own words, which is possible but not obvious.
Helpful Raccoon (
talk)
08:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
I understand u. But before i nominated the page. The sources are not just making sense to me. The few newspaper that was cited was just all about Meet Funnybros. The rest are from Nigerian blogs and music link containing Apple Music and the rest. Personal life he bought a Benz the two source cited are from blogs that are not reliable besides buying a Benz has nothing to do with notability. Gabriel(talk to me )11:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: The article about a comedian that meets
WP:GNG. Appearing in independent sources is notable if not presumably. There is a recognition for his skits but I see some unreliable sources, which can be cleaned. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!19:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Saw this page and wanted to over look it not until almost all the source, possibly all fails to meet Wikipedia independent, reliable and secondary. No point calling him a musician when all the source are from promotion link and also fails in music notability. Since 2023 issue was tagged but no changes. Gabriel(talk to me )00:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: Coverage is looking sparse. These two sources might count towards GNG, although they do look low-quality:
[1][2]. I am unable to consistently access guardian.ng.
Helpful Raccoon (
talk)
03:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
I don’t see how those sources you provided meets GNG neither low quality. Meanwhile, i have never heard the word “Low quality” while determining either an article meets GNG or not. If it passes it passes. If doesn’t pass, it doesn’t. You can visit the article page. Check the tag to understand what reliable, independent source it’s all about. The two source you provided failed to be independent because it doesn’t speak from a disinterest of the article subject. Gabriel(talk to me )04:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
By "low-quality" I meant that the tone is
tabloid-style and the articles don't contain a lot of independent analysis. The sources use non-neutral language, but I don't see indications that they have a vested interest in the subject. If the articles were sponsored, for example, they would be completely non-independent, but there is no indication of that (unless there's something I'm missing about the sources). Per
WP:IIS, "Independence does not imply even-handedness. An independent source may hold a strongly positive or negative view of a topic or an idea."
Helpful Raccoon (
talk)
05:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The sources could also be non-independent if the coverage is almost entirely based on the subject's own words, which is possible but not obvious.
Helpful Raccoon (
talk)
08:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
I understand u. But before i nominated the page. The sources are not just making sense to me. The few newspaper that was cited was just all about Meet Funnybros. The rest are from Nigerian blogs and music link containing Apple Music and the rest. Personal life he bought a Benz the two source cited are from blogs that are not reliable besides buying a Benz has nothing to do with notability. Gabriel(talk to me )11:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: The article about a comedian that meets
WP:GNG. Appearing in independent sources is notable if not presumably. There is a recognition for his skits but I see some unreliable sources, which can be cleaned. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!19:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply