The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:GNG. Coverage is limited to the most trivial of mentions. Seems like a waste of time AfD that never have been deprodded, unless I'm searching incorrectly.
TTN (
talk)
11:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Do you really still not look at the sources you post? How hard is it to take three seconds to read that and realize it's a panel by panel analysis of a page featuring the character and not actual commentary on the character?
TTN (
talk)
18:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The work is written by a Professor in Comparative Literature, was published by the University of Nebraska Press and I consider it quite satisfactory for our purpose. Per the fable of
the miller, his son and the donkey, this may not please everyone but so it goes. My !vote stands, being based on both policy and evidence.
Andrew🐉(
talk)
19:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Per usual, you dodge the actual point with an absolute nonsense rebuttal. Please explain how several pages dissecting the framing of comic panels is relevant to an article on the character. Being mentioned in the context of the dissection does not itself inherently equate to coverage on the character.
TTN (
talk)
19:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The analysis says things like "The following panels take the reader into the fictional mind of Flycatcher ... We see the facial expression of Flycatcher and construct his intuitive response." These descriptions and insights are clearly
WP:SIGCOV. Q.E.D. My !vote stands.
Andrew🐉(
talk)
21:29, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Once again, you dodge the question. Please explain how the analysis of the panels is relevant to the character rather than simply using the character as a vehicle to convey their point on framing a character's emotional state and inner thoughts through drawings and panel layout.
TTN (
talk)
21:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge to
List of Fables characters#Flycatcher - That list is a complete mess and needs some massive cleanup, but Flycatcher is actually one of the major characters of the series that should actually be covered there. I found a small bit of actual analysis of the character that goes beyond plot summary in
this book, but its the only decent thing I could find. As described in detail by TTN already, the source mentioned by Andrew above is not actually about the character himself, and contains no actual information that could be integrated into the article in anyway or provide notability.
Rorshacma (
talk)
23:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:GNG. Coverage is limited to the most trivial of mentions. Seems like a waste of time AfD that never have been deprodded, unless I'm searching incorrectly.
TTN (
talk)
11:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Do you really still not look at the sources you post? How hard is it to take three seconds to read that and realize it's a panel by panel analysis of a page featuring the character and not actual commentary on the character?
TTN (
talk)
18:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The work is written by a Professor in Comparative Literature, was published by the University of Nebraska Press and I consider it quite satisfactory for our purpose. Per the fable of
the miller, his son and the donkey, this may not please everyone but so it goes. My !vote stands, being based on both policy and evidence.
Andrew🐉(
talk)
19:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Per usual, you dodge the actual point with an absolute nonsense rebuttal. Please explain how several pages dissecting the framing of comic panels is relevant to an article on the character. Being mentioned in the context of the dissection does not itself inherently equate to coverage on the character.
TTN (
talk)
19:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The analysis says things like "The following panels take the reader into the fictional mind of Flycatcher ... We see the facial expression of Flycatcher and construct his intuitive response." These descriptions and insights are clearly
WP:SIGCOV. Q.E.D. My !vote stands.
Andrew🐉(
talk)
21:29, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Once again, you dodge the question. Please explain how the analysis of the panels is relevant to the character rather than simply using the character as a vehicle to convey their point on framing a character's emotional state and inner thoughts through drawings and panel layout.
TTN (
talk)
21:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge to
List of Fables characters#Flycatcher - That list is a complete mess and needs some massive cleanup, but Flycatcher is actually one of the major characters of the series that should actually be covered there. I found a small bit of actual analysis of the character that goes beyond plot summary in
this book, but its the only decent thing I could find. As described in detail by TTN already, the source mentioned by Andrew above is not actually about the character himself, and contains no actual information that could be integrated into the article in anyway or provide notability.
Rorshacma (
talk)
23:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.