- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:47, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Five Starcle Men
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Five Starcle Men ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
does not appear to meet notability requirements RF23 ( talk) 05:28, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:41, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh ( talk) 13:36, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh ( talk) 13:36, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
This band was influential in the underground experimental music scene of the 1990s. They have over 27,000 downloads on the Internet Archive and many devoted fans: https://archive.org/details/lf074mp3 It is a mistake to remove this page. Wikipedia needs to hold space for bands with an alternative media presence outside mainstream distribution and publishing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valis911 ( talk • contribs) 21:53, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The sources in the article are cack, and there seems to be nothing better out there. -- Michig ( talk) 10:08, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. The Village Voice is the one decent source in the article, but it mentions the band only briefly as part of a wider article about bands and teen suicide. "Wikipedia needs to hold space for bands with an alternative media presence outside mainstream distribution and publishing" – only if the bands in question pass the notability and verifiability guidelines of WP:GNG and WP:V, Valis911. Richard3120 ( talk) 16:52, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:47, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Five Starcle Men
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Five Starcle Men ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
does not appear to meet notability requirements RF23 ( talk) 05:28, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:41, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh ( talk) 13:36, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh ( talk) 13:36, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
This band was influential in the underground experimental music scene of the 1990s. They have over 27,000 downloads on the Internet Archive and many devoted fans: https://archive.org/details/lf074mp3 It is a mistake to remove this page. Wikipedia needs to hold space for bands with an alternative media presence outside mainstream distribution and publishing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valis911 ( talk • contribs) 21:53, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The sources in the article are cack, and there seems to be nothing better out there. -- Michig ( talk) 10:08, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. The Village Voice is the one decent source in the article, but it mentions the band only briefly as part of a wider article about bands and teen suicide. "Wikipedia needs to hold space for bands with an alternative media presence outside mainstream distribution and publishing" – only if the bands in question pass the notability and verifiability guidelines of WP:GNG and WP:V, Valis911. Richard3120 ( talk) 16:52, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.