The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not notable. As mentioned in the article, the "first lady/gentleman" is not a real title. The article's title refers to a title that neither exists in government or is widely used. Even if there is usage for the title, it does not have such significant usage that it would merit the term having its own WP page (
WP:NOTADICTIONARY). The article is a directory of spouses of presidents and fails
WP:NOTADIRECTORY.
Dawkin Verbier (
talk)
18:23, 4 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Cielquiparle makes excellent points above. Plus, it's not hard to find instances where official Singaporean government sources specifically cites the role of the wife/husband of the president or uses the term "First Lady" or gentleman in official context, including here by the national
Ministry of Communications and Information[1]. However, I'd advocate to keep the original "First Ladies and Gentlemen" title as well.
Scanlan (
talk)
02:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not notable. As mentioned in the article, the "first lady/gentleman" is not a real title. The article's title refers to a title that neither exists in government or is widely used. Even if there is usage for the title, it does not have such significant usage that it would merit the term having its own WP page (
WP:NOTADICTIONARY). The article is a directory of spouses of presidents and fails
WP:NOTADIRECTORY.
Dawkin Verbier (
talk)
18:23, 4 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Cielquiparle makes excellent points above. Plus, it's not hard to find instances where official Singaporean government sources specifically cites the role of the wife/husband of the president or uses the term "First Lady" or gentleman in official context, including here by the national
Ministry of Communications and Information[1]. However, I'd advocate to keep the original "First Ladies and Gentlemen" title as well.
Scanlan (
talk)
02:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.