The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Wow. A game that does not meet NVG? That's so rare it could make it notable. I am sure that if we search a bit more we will find some obscure game review site that has a copy of a press release or such that will make it pass VGN with flying colors. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here10:33, 5 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep, though probably rename to the more vague
Fallen Legion instead, because there’s a few different variations and re-releases with it now. Article is in rough shape, but the sourcing is out there. Looks to be a failure of
WP:BEFORE. Sources below are considered reliable per
WP:VG/S.
Keep - Is a legit game and I'm not the greatest and constructing a perfect article, sorry. But hopefully other people may fill in the holes in future since it doesn't should stay since It's legit with reliable sources out there.
Thursby16 (
talk)
KeepSergecross73 I think I have to clarify the mess about the title of the game. Firstly, this game got separate two releases: one on PSVita and PS4 (Fallen Legion: Sins of an Empire and Fallen Legion: Flames of Rebellion, whereas this AfD and article is about is the Vita one)[1] Then, in the same year, these 2 games combined got released on PC as Fallen Legion+[2]and then on Switch as Fallen Legion: Rise to Glory[3]. Certainly a notable game franchise per
WP:GNG in multiple significant coverage in reliable sources where I also found
[4] and
[5] but it needs to move to
Fallen Legion at the very least, as the PSVita version is it's least notable iteration.
Jovanmilic97 (
talk)
09:00, 7 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep as notability has been established by coverage in reliable sources, and there is clearly sufficient material available to expand the article substantially. Issues with article title, organization of contents, and addition of sources can be addressed outside AfD.
Bakazaka (
talk)
04:30, 12 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Wow. A game that does not meet NVG? That's so rare it could make it notable. I am sure that if we search a bit more we will find some obscure game review site that has a copy of a press release or such that will make it pass VGN with flying colors. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here10:33, 5 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep, though probably rename to the more vague
Fallen Legion instead, because there’s a few different variations and re-releases with it now. Article is in rough shape, but the sourcing is out there. Looks to be a failure of
WP:BEFORE. Sources below are considered reliable per
WP:VG/S.
Keep - Is a legit game and I'm not the greatest and constructing a perfect article, sorry. But hopefully other people may fill in the holes in future since it doesn't should stay since It's legit with reliable sources out there.
Thursby16 (
talk)
KeepSergecross73 I think I have to clarify the mess about the title of the game. Firstly, this game got separate two releases: one on PSVita and PS4 (Fallen Legion: Sins of an Empire and Fallen Legion: Flames of Rebellion, whereas this AfD and article is about is the Vita one)[1] Then, in the same year, these 2 games combined got released on PC as Fallen Legion+[2]and then on Switch as Fallen Legion: Rise to Glory[3]. Certainly a notable game franchise per
WP:GNG in multiple significant coverage in reliable sources where I also found
[4] and
[5] but it needs to move to
Fallen Legion at the very least, as the PSVita version is it's least notable iteration.
Jovanmilic97 (
talk)
09:00, 7 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep as notability has been established by coverage in reliable sources, and there is clearly sufficient material available to expand the article substantially. Issues with article title, organization of contents, and addition of sources can be addressed outside AfD.
Bakazaka (
talk)
04:30, 12 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.