- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 00:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
F3tto
- F3tto ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Autobiography of a non-notable artist (he says himself that he has achieved little). Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Is it just me or are many of the references cited within the article the same? It seems to be a very lengthy article with not much to back it up. I would recommend that it drastically be reduced so the references don't seem so stretched, otherwise as it stands I have to agree that it seems to lacking in notability and does have an autobiographical feel to it. Unless someone cares to cut a lot of the filler of this down, I would have to say Delete. Just my neutral standpoint on the matter.
WeAreAllStars (
talk) 9:22, 16 January 2015 (EST)
- Delete Insufficient coverage from reliable sources for notability. Refs are either promotional or from unreliable sources. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 00:03, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 00:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
F3tto
- F3tto ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Autobiography of a non-notable artist (he says himself that he has achieved little). Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Is it just me or are many of the references cited within the article the same? It seems to be a very lengthy article with not much to back it up. I would recommend that it drastically be reduced so the references don't seem so stretched, otherwise as it stands I have to agree that it seems to lacking in notability and does have an autobiographical feel to it. Unless someone cares to cut a lot of the filler of this down, I would have to say Delete. Just my neutral standpoint on the matter.
WeAreAllStars (
talk) 9:22, 16 January 2015 (EST)
- Delete Insufficient coverage from reliable sources for notability. Refs are either promotional or from unreliable sources. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 00:03, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.