The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Doesn't meet notability. Could use expansion, but otherwise the only thing notable about this person was appearing on Forbes 30 Under 30 a decade ago — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Nswix (
talk •
contribs)
22:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment I think she's notable, one mention in Forbes, that doesn't look like and advertorial in GNews and one in a peer-reviewed journal,
[1].
Oaktree b (
talk)
17:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - article needs some work but alongside reliable sources such as
1 and
2 already on the article, it's easy to find more sources for example Business Insider3 and
4. Proquest gives lots of hits eg The importance of being earnest in The Business Times and also she is now apparently an adjunct professor
5.
Mujinga (
talk)
17:52, 4 May 2022 (UTC)reply
saw this comment thread and found a few more reliable sources and more recent news/highlights that I contributed to the article
Hjd555 (
talk)
23:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Looking at that google scholar I think there's another E Fu who is a scientist and the citations got rolled together. But this Fu doesn't need to pass NSCHOLAR becuase she passes GNG already. I just meant our article should include her current position.
Mujinga (
talk)
18:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. A one-time media blitz for a student entrepreneur does not add up to long-term notability, and her subsequent career as a capitalist and part-time academic does not appear notable at all, neither under
WP:GNG for the business work nor under
WP:PROF for the academic side. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
16:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Doesn't meet notability. Could use expansion, but otherwise the only thing notable about this person was appearing on Forbes 30 Under 30 a decade ago — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Nswix (
talk •
contribs)
22:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment I think she's notable, one mention in Forbes, that doesn't look like and advertorial in GNews and one in a peer-reviewed journal,
[1].
Oaktree b (
talk)
17:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - article needs some work but alongside reliable sources such as
1 and
2 already on the article, it's easy to find more sources for example Business Insider3 and
4. Proquest gives lots of hits eg The importance of being earnest in The Business Times and also she is now apparently an adjunct professor
5.
Mujinga (
talk)
17:52, 4 May 2022 (UTC)reply
saw this comment thread and found a few more reliable sources and more recent news/highlights that I contributed to the article
Hjd555 (
talk)
23:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Looking at that google scholar I think there's another E Fu who is a scientist and the citations got rolled together. But this Fu doesn't need to pass NSCHOLAR becuase she passes GNG already. I just meant our article should include her current position.
Mujinga (
talk)
18:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. A one-time media blitz for a student entrepreneur does not add up to long-term notability, and her subsequent career as a capitalist and part-time academic does not appear notable at all, neither under
WP:GNG for the business work nor under
WP:PROF for the academic side. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
16:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.