The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:ANYBIO and
WP:GNG. None of the cited sources constitute significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Most are passing mentions or quotations from Marchesoni in articles about other topics, or articles by Marchesoni herself. The exceptions are either interviews with Marchesoni without secondary commentary or analysis (non-independent), or self-published (non-reliable), or both.
Jfire (
talk)
17:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete More crypto fluff. "Tokenomics" should really have a link to another article, otherwise this whole article falls flat; what the heck is that? Expert at age 26, with zero mentions in any kind of RS.
Oaktree b (
talk)
21:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable per WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO, references are a bunch of interviews with her, quotes from her and other passing mentions. Nothing substantial ABOUT her, and searches don't find anything significantly better. Just fluff and self-promotion, as many things crypto tend to be, sadly.
Neiltonks (
talk)
10:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:ANYBIO and
WP:GNG. None of the cited sources constitute significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Most are passing mentions or quotations from Marchesoni in articles about other topics, or articles by Marchesoni herself. The exceptions are either interviews with Marchesoni without secondary commentary or analysis (non-independent), or self-published (non-reliable), or both.
Jfire (
talk)
17:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete More crypto fluff. "Tokenomics" should really have a link to another article, otherwise this whole article falls flat; what the heck is that? Expert at age 26, with zero mentions in any kind of RS.
Oaktree b (
talk)
21:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable per WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO, references are a bunch of interviews with her, quotes from her and other passing mentions. Nothing substantial ABOUT her, and searches don't find anything significantly better. Just fluff and self-promotion, as many things crypto tend to be, sadly.
Neiltonks (
talk)
10:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.