The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was IAR Close. Any established editor is welcome to bring this back to AfD if there's merit.
StarMississippi 02:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete As reviewer noted, the author fails
WP:NAUTHOR. Books the author has created are not well-known and are not significant, have brought about major changes in any way.
Procedural Comment This is one of a series of deletions started by a brand new account that has now been blocked as a sockpuppet. See
[1]. Not sure if a procedural close is in order.
Sirfurboy🏄 (
talk) 08:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)reply
WP:G5 doesn't apply as checkuser hasn't connected them to any master yet.
84.146.2.66 (
talk) 11:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)reply
As I have said in all the other places you have pasted this comment, G5 is irrelevant. That is a speedy deletion criterion - the opposite of what I am suggesting.
Weak delete. There is some coverage in local press like
[2],
[3],
[4]. If someone here can find book reviews of her books then consider my !vote as keep.
84.146.2.66 (
talk) 11:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC) —
84.146.2.66 (
talk) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. Blocked sock.
Sirfurboy🏄 (
talk) 21:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was IAR Close. Any established editor is welcome to bring this back to AfD if there's merit.
StarMississippi 02:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete As reviewer noted, the author fails
WP:NAUTHOR. Books the author has created are not well-known and are not significant, have brought about major changes in any way.
Procedural Comment This is one of a series of deletions started by a brand new account that has now been blocked as a sockpuppet. See
[1]. Not sure if a procedural close is in order.
Sirfurboy🏄 (
talk) 08:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)reply
WP:G5 doesn't apply as checkuser hasn't connected them to any master yet.
84.146.2.66 (
talk) 11:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)reply
As I have said in all the other places you have pasted this comment, G5 is irrelevant. That is a speedy deletion criterion - the opposite of what I am suggesting.
Weak delete. There is some coverage in local press like
[2],
[3],
[4]. If someone here can find book reviews of her books then consider my !vote as keep.
84.146.2.66 (
talk) 11:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC) —
84.146.2.66 (
talk) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. Blocked sock.
Sirfurboy🏄 (
talk) 21:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.