The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete preferably speedy - this is a paid for piece by an undisclosed paid editor but aside from the TOU violations, she isn't notable and I don't even see a credible claim of such, much less sources here or anywhere to support a claim.
PRAXIDICAE🌈13:09, 11 July 2022 (UTC)reply
DeleteWP:TNT. She has 2.25 followers on Youtube which makes it influencer terrority and likely notable but the article is something from orbit. A complete mess, no effective references, ext links in the articles, raw urls in the lede', refs are all social media and streaming sites and still the article is largly unsourced. There will be an article but not this. scope_creepTalk09:38, 12 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Notability is not established by sourcing the article to her own
self-published content on social networking or streaming sites — it's established by referencing the article to third party
reliable source coverage about her in real media, of which absolutely none has been shown here.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:11, 12 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete preferably speedy - this is a paid for piece by an undisclosed paid editor but aside from the TOU violations, she isn't notable and I don't even see a credible claim of such, much less sources here or anywhere to support a claim.
PRAXIDICAE🌈13:09, 11 July 2022 (UTC)reply
DeleteWP:TNT. She has 2.25 followers on Youtube which makes it influencer terrority and likely notable but the article is something from orbit. A complete mess, no effective references, ext links in the articles, raw urls in the lede', refs are all social media and streaming sites and still the article is largly unsourced. There will be an article but not this. scope_creepTalk09:38, 12 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Notability is not established by sourcing the article to her own
self-published content on social networking or streaming sites — it's established by referencing the article to third party
reliable source coverage about her in real media, of which absolutely none has been shown here.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:11, 12 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.