- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Barkeep49 ( talk) 19:38, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
EAS Alexander
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- EAS Alexander ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor WP:PLOT element that completely fails WP:GNG/ WP:NFICTION. Definition of fancruft. Deproded by User:Andrew Davidson with unhelpful technical summary. Andrew, can you tell us why you think this topic deserves its own article? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Article fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 23:57, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of starships in Babylon 5, where this ship is covered with WP:DUEWEIGHT. – sgeureka t• c 08:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Completely in-universe plot summary with not a single source being used. Searching for sources turns up nothing in any reliable secondary sources. Just being already listed in a crufty "List of" article isn't an automatic free pass for completely non-notable subjects to survive as a Redirect. Rorshacma ( talk) 16:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Barkeep49 ( talk) 19:38, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
EAS Alexander
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- EAS Alexander ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor WP:PLOT element that completely fails WP:GNG/ WP:NFICTION. Definition of fancruft. Deproded by User:Andrew Davidson with unhelpful technical summary. Andrew, can you tell us why you think this topic deserves its own article? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Article fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 23:57, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of starships in Babylon 5, where this ship is covered with WP:DUEWEIGHT. – sgeureka t• c 08:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Completely in-universe plot summary with not a single source being used. Searching for sources turns up nothing in any reliable secondary sources. Just being already listed in a crufty "List of" article isn't an automatic free pass for completely non-notable subjects to survive as a Redirect. Rorshacma ( talk) 16:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.