From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ♠ PMC(talk) 05:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Duane Adler (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Screenwriter of uncertain notability. Mccapra ( talk) 22:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 22:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 22:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 22:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: The figure seems notable. Mccapra, did you follow WP:BEFORE in seeking sources outside of Wikipedia? I found the following in a few minutes:
Thanks, Erik ( talk |  contrib) ( ping me) 23:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. Interesting. Broadwayworld.com I must admit I’d overlooked and I agree it does show notability. The Baltimore Sun shows in my search but is blocked in the UK. Hollywoodreporter.com doesn’t show in my search. He’s named in the headline which is a strong plus, but only very briefly mentioned in the article. Motionpicture.org does show in my search, but it’s an interview with him rather than a source about him. Deadline.com I get and it may demonstrate notability but it looks like a rehashed press release to me. M.mid-day.com I don’t get in my search results. It may demonstrate notability but is mostly an interview about him. Apart from these I see one piece in an Indian outlet I’ve never heard of before and nothing else that looks like reliable independent sourcing. So yes, despite overlooking one of the sources you highlight, to me notability seems doubtful. Mccapra ( talk) 03:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per WP:NEXIST and WP:ARTN. Adler has written notable films with Wikipedia pages, and Erik has shown that there are multiple independent reliable sources discussing Adler and his career. The existing article is badly written and has no sources, but WP:ARTN says that notability is unaffected by the state of the current article; notability is determined by whether sources exist that could be used to improve the article. I don't know what Mccapra means by "shows in my search" and "I don't get in my search results", but it seems like pointless nitpicking of perfectly adequate sources. — Toughpigs ( talk) 03:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment What I mean is that google does not show these results when I search, so until Erik shared them, I could not see them. Google does not show the same results for everyone. My comment was in response to his querying whether I had looked for sources. Mccapra ( talk) 04:34, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ♠ PMC(talk) 05:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Duane Adler (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Screenwriter of uncertain notability. Mccapra ( talk) 22:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 22:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 22:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 22:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: The figure seems notable. Mccapra, did you follow WP:BEFORE in seeking sources outside of Wikipedia? I found the following in a few minutes:
Thanks, Erik ( talk |  contrib) ( ping me) 23:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. Interesting. Broadwayworld.com I must admit I’d overlooked and I agree it does show notability. The Baltimore Sun shows in my search but is blocked in the UK. Hollywoodreporter.com doesn’t show in my search. He’s named in the headline which is a strong plus, but only very briefly mentioned in the article. Motionpicture.org does show in my search, but it’s an interview with him rather than a source about him. Deadline.com I get and it may demonstrate notability but it looks like a rehashed press release to me. M.mid-day.com I don’t get in my search results. It may demonstrate notability but is mostly an interview about him. Apart from these I see one piece in an Indian outlet I’ve never heard of before and nothing else that looks like reliable independent sourcing. So yes, despite overlooking one of the sources you highlight, to me notability seems doubtful. Mccapra ( talk) 03:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per WP:NEXIST and WP:ARTN. Adler has written notable films with Wikipedia pages, and Erik has shown that there are multiple independent reliable sources discussing Adler and his career. The existing article is badly written and has no sources, but WP:ARTN says that notability is unaffected by the state of the current article; notability is determined by whether sources exist that could be used to improve the article. I don't know what Mccapra means by "shows in my search" and "I don't get in my search results", but it seems like pointless nitpicking of perfectly adequate sources. — Toughpigs ( talk) 03:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment What I mean is that google does not show these results when I search, so until Erik shared them, I could not see them. Google does not show the same results for everyone. My comment was in response to his querying whether I had looked for sources. Mccapra ( talk) 04:34, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook