From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Despite two relists no discussion of the sources mentioned by Lizard the Wizard happened. Just saying WP:TOOSOON without discussing whether the article currently meets WP:BASIC or WP:GNG is not sufficient. That the article might be recreated anyway is not a valid reason for deletion if he is already notable now. So Why 12:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Drew Rasmussen

Drew Rasmussen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rasmussen is not signing with Tampa Bay, so we can't merge this to Tampa Bay Rays minor league players. There are some sources (like this), but I don't think there are enough for WP:GNG. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 19:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 19:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 19:14, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete still at college baseball level, there are very few notable college baseball players, and he has nothing to suggest he is one of the few. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:13, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Is pitching a perfect game not sufficient? Especially when considered with everything else, such as being the ace on a team that won 60+ games and only lost 6 and being drafted in the first round. Is college baseball still not at that level of notability? Lizard ( talk) 15:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Passes GNG in my opinion. Gained national media attention for pitching a perfect game, [1] [2] [3] national media attention for being drafted in the first round of the draft, [4] and national media attention for the fact that he won't sign with the Rays. [5] Lizard ( talk) 16:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Delete WP:TOOSOON. The page will most likely be re-created if he is drafted (and signs a pro contract) next year. Power~enwiki ( talk) 03:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 05:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:58, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Despite two relists no discussion of the sources mentioned by Lizard the Wizard happened. Just saying WP:TOOSOON without discussing whether the article currently meets WP:BASIC or WP:GNG is not sufficient. That the article might be recreated anyway is not a valid reason for deletion if he is already notable now. So Why 12:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Drew Rasmussen

Drew Rasmussen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rasmussen is not signing with Tampa Bay, so we can't merge this to Tampa Bay Rays minor league players. There are some sources (like this), but I don't think there are enough for WP:GNG. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 19:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 19:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 19:14, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete still at college baseball level, there are very few notable college baseball players, and he has nothing to suggest he is one of the few. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:13, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Is pitching a perfect game not sufficient? Especially when considered with everything else, such as being the ace on a team that won 60+ games and only lost 6 and being drafted in the first round. Is college baseball still not at that level of notability? Lizard ( talk) 15:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Passes GNG in my opinion. Gained national media attention for pitching a perfect game, [1] [2] [3] national media attention for being drafted in the first round of the draft, [4] and national media attention for the fact that he won't sign with the Rays. [5] Lizard ( talk) 16:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Delete WP:TOOSOON. The page will most likely be re-created if he is drafted (and signs a pro contract) next year. Power~enwiki ( talk) 03:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 05:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:58, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook