The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Despite two relists no discussion of the sources mentioned by Lizard the Wizard happened. Just saying
WP:TOOSOON without discussing whether the article currently meets
WP:BASIC or
WP:GNG is not sufficient. That the article might be recreated anyway is not a valid reason for deletion if he is already notable now. SoWhy 12:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete still at college baseball level, there are very few notable college baseball players, and he has nothing to suggest he is one of the few.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 03:13, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment Is pitching a perfect game not sufficient? Especially when considered with everything else, such as being the ace on a team that won 60+ games and only lost 6 and being drafted in the first round. Is college baseball still not at that level of notability?
Lizard (
talk) 15:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Passes GNG in my opinion. Gained national media attention for pitching a perfect game,
[1][2][3] national media attention for being drafted in the first round of the draft,
[4] and national media attention for the fact that he won't sign with the Rays.
[5]Lizard (
talk) 16:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Weak DeleteWP:TOOSOON. The page will most likely be re-created if he is drafted (and signs a pro contract) next year.
Power~enwiki (
talk) 03:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Winged Blades Godric 05:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 01:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Despite two relists no discussion of the sources mentioned by Lizard the Wizard happened. Just saying
WP:TOOSOON without discussing whether the article currently meets
WP:BASIC or
WP:GNG is not sufficient. That the article might be recreated anyway is not a valid reason for deletion if he is already notable now. SoWhy 12:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete still at college baseball level, there are very few notable college baseball players, and he has nothing to suggest he is one of the few.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 03:13, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment Is pitching a perfect game not sufficient? Especially when considered with everything else, such as being the ace on a team that won 60+ games and only lost 6 and being drafted in the first round. Is college baseball still not at that level of notability?
Lizard (
talk) 15:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Passes GNG in my opinion. Gained national media attention for pitching a perfect game,
[1][2][3] national media attention for being drafted in the first round of the draft,
[4] and national media attention for the fact that he won't sign with the Rays.
[5]Lizard (
talk) 16:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Weak DeleteWP:TOOSOON. The page will most likely be re-created if he is drafted (and signs a pro contract) next year.
Power~enwiki (
talk) 03:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Winged Blades Godric 05:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 01:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.