The result was keep. J.delanoy gabs adds 18:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply
This company is non-notable, they fail both WP:WEB and WP:CORP. It is nearly impossible to find reliable secondary sources (non-blog, non-forum) that demonstrate significant non-incidental, non-trivial coverage of DreamHost. Very few other Web hosting companies in the Web hosting Category have articles. In the most recent Deletion Discussion the primary source referenced to support "notability", webhosting.info, was deleted from this article for questionable reliability, as discussed here on the talk page. Further, this primary source "data" is likely skewed by Domain_tasting and domain parking, as acknowledged by the source. Judas278 ( talk) 16:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. J.delanoy gabs adds 18:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply
This company is non-notable, they fail both WP:WEB and WP:CORP. It is nearly impossible to find reliable secondary sources (non-blog, non-forum) that demonstrate significant non-incidental, non-trivial coverage of DreamHost. Very few other Web hosting companies in the Web hosting Category have articles. In the most recent Deletion Discussion the primary source referenced to support "notability", webhosting.info, was deleted from this article for questionable reliability, as discussed here on the talk page. Further, this primary source "data" is likely skewed by Domain_tasting and domain parking, as acknowledged by the source. Judas278 ( talk) 16:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC) reply