The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep/rename This article appears to cover both the 2008 game and the 2017 game ("Dragon Ball Super Card game") which is apparently basically a revision to the 2008 game? Dragon Ball Super Card Game appears to be notable. There is what appears to be an independent book (
[1], and a fair bit of coverage by relevant fan sites (
[2], [(
[3],
[4],
[5] including reviews
[6]. I'm no subject expert, but it looks like the 2017 game is notable and it makes sense to also have some coverage of the 2008 game. That said, the current article has lots of problems and could stand to be hugely trimmed.
Hobit (
talk)
21:57, 7 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Weak keep - There are likely many articles available for citing as this is a popular series. It needs a lot of TLC, or as Piotr said, some TNT. Strong oppose to redirect.
Leitmotiv (
talk)
23:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep/rename This article appears to cover both the 2008 game and the 2017 game ("Dragon Ball Super Card game") which is apparently basically a revision to the 2008 game? Dragon Ball Super Card Game appears to be notable. There is what appears to be an independent book (
[1], and a fair bit of coverage by relevant fan sites (
[2], [(
[3],
[4],
[5] including reviews
[6]. I'm no subject expert, but it looks like the 2017 game is notable and it makes sense to also have some coverage of the 2008 game. That said, the current article has lots of problems and could stand to be hugely trimmed.
Hobit (
talk)
21:57, 7 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Weak keep - There are likely many articles available for citing as this is a popular series. It needs a lot of TLC, or as Piotr said, some TNT. Strong oppose to redirect.
Leitmotiv (
talk)
23:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.