- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Doreen Valiente. There is no requirement that redirects be notable. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Doreen Valiente Foundation
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Doreen Valiente Foundation ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing to suggest that this is a notable organisation, a single line mention could be added to the Doreen Valiente article. Theroadislong ( talk) 19:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong ( talk) 19:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong ( talk) 19:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong ( talk) 19:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Doreen Valiente, where this subject is already sufficiently covered based on the sources. Not seeing enough coverage to get over the WP:ORG/ WP:NOPAGE hurdles. — Rhododendrites [[User_talk:Rhododendrites|tal K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)k]] \\ 20:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: does not meet WP:NORG; insufficiently notable to be worth a redirect; no need to preserve history, as only consisting of WP:NOT material. -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:59, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Does not meet NORG, but why is it listed under Fictional elements? It is a real world organization, isn't it? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Doreen Valiente. Looks like the information herein would make a great addition to that article. T.B.A. ( talk) 05:06, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete salvage a couple sentences for use in Valiente's page. But as there are no citations - there is nothing to really use. Sgerbic ( talk) 22:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom, fails WP:NORG; not notable enough for a redirect CommanderWaterford ( talk) 21:38, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Doreen Valiente. There is no requirement that redirects be notable. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Doreen Valiente Foundation
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Doreen Valiente Foundation ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing to suggest that this is a notable organisation, a single line mention could be added to the Doreen Valiente article. Theroadislong ( talk) 19:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong ( talk) 19:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong ( talk) 19:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong ( talk) 19:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Doreen Valiente, where this subject is already sufficiently covered based on the sources. Not seeing enough coverage to get over the WP:ORG/ WP:NOPAGE hurdles. — Rhododendrites [[User_talk:Rhododendrites|tal K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)k]] \\ 20:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: does not meet WP:NORG; insufficiently notable to be worth a redirect; no need to preserve history, as only consisting of WP:NOT material. -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:59, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Does not meet NORG, but why is it listed under Fictional elements? It is a real world organization, isn't it? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Doreen Valiente. Looks like the information herein would make a great addition to that article. T.B.A. ( talk) 05:06, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete salvage a couple sentences for use in Valiente's page. But as there are no citations - there is nothing to really use. Sgerbic ( talk) 22:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom, fails WP:NORG; not notable enough for a redirect CommanderWaterford ( talk) 21:38, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.