- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. A Train talk 07:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Dionne Rakeem
- Dionne Rakeem ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable musician. The claim of her song "Sweeter than Wine" charting at 46th in the United Kingdom may be false as The Official Charts Company does not show anything about Rakeem or her song (not even in archives) (
source in article shows no entry). Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:MUSICBIO. No secondary sources can be found. The subject-specific guideline (WP:MUSICBIO) exists as secondary to WP:GNG and "meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept." —
Za
wl
15:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:MUSICBIO#C2. Proof is available here.-- Laun chba ller 15:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG-- XFhumu Talk 15:40, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Is anyone going to address the MUSICBIO findings?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c ) ( m) 05:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. A Train talk 07:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Dionne Rakeem
- Dionne Rakeem ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable musician. The claim of her song "Sweeter than Wine" charting at 46th in the United Kingdom may be false as The Official Charts Company does not show anything about Rakeem or her song (not even in archives) (
source in article shows no entry). Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:MUSICBIO. No secondary sources can be found. The subject-specific guideline (WP:MUSICBIO) exists as secondary to WP:GNG and "meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept." —
Za
wl
15:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:MUSICBIO#C2. Proof is available here.-- Laun chba ller 15:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG-- XFhumu Talk 15:40, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Is anyone going to address the MUSICBIO findings?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c ) ( m) 05:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.