- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 12:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Daniel Saltman ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reason Montaukwarrior ( talk) 19:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC) This is a blatant biography with severe notability issues. Should be removed.
- Hi, do you have any connection to Daniel Saltman positive or negative as your account is a single purpose one, devoted to deleting this article?
Atlantic306 (
talk) 20:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- As it is an autobiography I won't be voting for it to remain Atlantic306 ( talk) 20:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, do you have any connection to Daniel Saltman positive or negative as your account is a single purpose one, devoted to deleting this article?
Atlantic306 (
talk) 20:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 03:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 03:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 03:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: As per norm. does not meet WP:DIRECTOR. CASSIOPEIA ( talk) 12:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable businessman. Wikipedia is not supposed to be Linkedin. Which is one key reason we need to require use of real names as usernames, and make it so all articles have to have someone else besides the creator approve them to start to exist. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 12:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Daniel Saltman ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reason Montaukwarrior ( talk) 19:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC) This is a blatant biography with severe notability issues. Should be removed.
- Hi, do you have any connection to Daniel Saltman positive or negative as your account is a single purpose one, devoted to deleting this article?
Atlantic306 (
talk) 20:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- As it is an autobiography I won't be voting for it to remain Atlantic306 ( talk) 20:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, do you have any connection to Daniel Saltman positive or negative as your account is a single purpose one, devoted to deleting this article?
Atlantic306 (
talk) 20:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 03:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 03:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 03:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: As per norm. does not meet WP:DIRECTOR. CASSIOPEIA ( talk) 12:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable businessman. Wikipedia is not supposed to be Linkedin. Which is one key reason we need to require use of real names as usernames, and make it so all articles have to have someone else besides the creator approve them to start to exist. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.