- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. A Train talk 06:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Daniel Gildar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial sources. Should have been speeded , but someone removed the CSD because "the article had sources." Not really sure why the editor failed to look at the qualify of and availability of the sources. reddogsix ( talk) 11:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - With some help, this article could potentially be rounded out. Seems to be notable in the local area, and with his international and music connections, it could be just a matter of putting in some elbow grease. - NsTaGaTr ( Talk) 15:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- "Not really sure why the editor failed to look at the qualify of and availability of the sources." - that would be me, and that would be because such an activity is for a debate here, not at CSD. See User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to A7 and User:SoWhy/Common A7 mistakes. That somebody has not !voted delete justifies the reason for coming here. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Thanks for the clarification. Not sure I agree with your view. reddogsix ( talk) 17:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Try being an admin and getting a "nice" message like "why did u delete my article u fascist" ;-) As for the actual notability, not sure - I can only find
this one source and not a lot else.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
17:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- I'd use a LOL, but in reality it is not funny to get/put up with abuse in any situation. I did a WP:BEFORE prior to the CSD nomination and also found it to be lacking. My best to you.... reddogsix ( talk) 17:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- fails WP:MUSIC not WP:ANYBIO written as WP:PROMO without relevant WP:CS-- EC Racing ( talk) 20:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete there are no reliable sources backing up this article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 01:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Based on my searches of English-language sources, he doesn't appear to be notable as any combination of (Danny or Daniel) (Gilder or Gildar). Perhaps somebody who can read Hebrew better than I do can perform a search to see if there are sources in Hebrew. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 21:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. The article presents no evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:MUSICIAN. Especially in view of the language barrier, I'd be willing to change my mind if adequate sources show up during the AfD, but more is needed than just a vague hope of help and elbow grease. — David Eppstein ( talk) 03:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Borderline notable cantor. There are significantly less sources in Hebrew than in English - he is US based - and based on my BEFORE in English and Hebrew I don't think he passes the notability threshold. Icewhiz ( talk) 06:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The content of the article doesn't support notability and a Google search doesn't turn up anything to make the case no matter what variants of the name. Alansohn ( talk) 20:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. A Train talk 06:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Daniel Gildar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial sources. Should have been speeded , but someone removed the CSD because "the article had sources." Not really sure why the editor failed to look at the qualify of and availability of the sources. reddogsix ( talk) 11:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - With some help, this article could potentially be rounded out. Seems to be notable in the local area, and with his international and music connections, it could be just a matter of putting in some elbow grease. - NsTaGaTr ( Talk) 15:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- "Not really sure why the editor failed to look at the qualify of and availability of the sources." - that would be me, and that would be because such an activity is for a debate here, not at CSD. See User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to A7 and User:SoWhy/Common A7 mistakes. That somebody has not !voted delete justifies the reason for coming here. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Thanks for the clarification. Not sure I agree with your view. reddogsix ( talk) 17:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Try being an admin and getting a "nice" message like "why did u delete my article u fascist" ;-) As for the actual notability, not sure - I can only find
this one source and not a lot else.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
17:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- I'd use a LOL, but in reality it is not funny to get/put up with abuse in any situation. I did a WP:BEFORE prior to the CSD nomination and also found it to be lacking. My best to you.... reddogsix ( talk) 17:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- fails WP:MUSIC not WP:ANYBIO written as WP:PROMO without relevant WP:CS-- EC Racing ( talk) 20:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete there are no reliable sources backing up this article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 01:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Based on my searches of English-language sources, he doesn't appear to be notable as any combination of (Danny or Daniel) (Gilder or Gildar). Perhaps somebody who can read Hebrew better than I do can perform a search to see if there are sources in Hebrew. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 21:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. The article presents no evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:MUSICIAN. Especially in view of the language barrier, I'd be willing to change my mind if adequate sources show up during the AfD, but more is needed than just a vague hope of help and elbow grease. — David Eppstein ( talk) 03:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Borderline notable cantor. There are significantly less sources in Hebrew than in English - he is US based - and based on my BEFORE in English and Hebrew I don't think he passes the notability threshold. Icewhiz ( talk) 06:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The content of the article doesn't support notability and a Google search doesn't turn up anything to make the case no matter what variants of the name. Alansohn ( talk) 20:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.