- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Cyber-Complex Foundation
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cyber-Complex Foundation ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I prodded this with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar.". It was deprodded by User:NemesisAT who on my talk wrote " there appears to be room for expansion from the Polish Wikipedia entry, and because it is newly established and active and thus likely to attract more attention in the future". The latter argument is a WP:ATA#CRYSTAL fallacy (nice one, haven't seen this one in years...), and the former, well, there is not much more on pl wiki, the article there is subject to [[:pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2021:07:26:Fundacja Cyber-Complex |its own AfD]], and so far only its WP:SPA creator is defending it. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: References don't pass general notability at this stage. There is an SPA account behind this page (and Thena, which is in draft). -- Whiteguru ( talk) 02:25, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 03:16, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Delete Does not pass Wikipedia:Notability (companies). -- KonsTomasz ( talk) 08:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)blocked sock- Delete: Barely found anything about the organization. Easily fails WP:NORG. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 10:00, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Cyber-Complex Foundation
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cyber-Complex Foundation ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I prodded this with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar.". It was deprodded by User:NemesisAT who on my talk wrote " there appears to be room for expansion from the Polish Wikipedia entry, and because it is newly established and active and thus likely to attract more attention in the future". The latter argument is a WP:ATA#CRYSTAL fallacy (nice one, haven't seen this one in years...), and the former, well, there is not much more on pl wiki, the article there is subject to [[:pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2021:07:26:Fundacja Cyber-Complex |its own AfD]], and so far only its WP:SPA creator is defending it. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: References don't pass general notability at this stage. There is an SPA account behind this page (and Thena, which is in draft). -- Whiteguru ( talk) 02:25, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 03:16, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Delete Does not pass Wikipedia:Notability (companies). -- KonsTomasz ( talk) 08:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)blocked sock- Delete: Barely found anything about the organization. Easily fails WP:NORG. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 10:00, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.