This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 July 4. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2014 September 27. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 21:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC) reply
An indiscriminate ragbag of unrelated complaints under a title which frames the treatment to be implicitly hostile contrary to core policy. Colonel Warden ( talk) 21:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC) reply
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 July 4. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2014 September 27. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 21:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC) reply
An indiscriminate ragbag of unrelated complaints under a title which frames the treatment to be implicitly hostile contrary to core policy. Colonel Warden ( talk) 21:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC) reply