- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 15:45, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Crispian Jago ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP with no references. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. scope_creep Talk 09:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:20, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:20, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Seems notable, but I'm still not sure what she does. Appears to be a higher-level, but not top tier, government functionary. Lack of inline reference tags to help establish notability and the article is hard to read. Oaktree b ( talk) 03:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Maybe the blog is notable (and it feels like there's a bit of WP:COATRACK going on here), but this is not inherited by the individual. 1292simon ( talk) 08:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep If someone's notable, we should keep the article, and clean it up if necessary. At least I think it would benefit a relist to confirm sources like this (mentioning Jago's blog and readership) are on the same person and can help improve things. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- I think it is the same person.
scope_creep
Talk
17:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- The reason I listed it, is although there is plenty of coverage, and there is, Telgraph, Guardian, Independent, Vox, Foxnews, Spectator and on, its very much mentions of the blog, or his atheist stance. The book chapter is in-depth, and reliable and independent, a good bit there, but a single reference is insufficient to establish WP:BIO
- I think it is the same person.
scope_creep
Talk
17:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. There's just not a lot to be written about the subject with the given sources. Most mentions are passing, and the book chapters include him but don't say very much about him. Citing ( talk) 04:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 15:45, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Crispian Jago ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP with no references. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. scope_creep Talk 09:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:20, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:20, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Seems notable, but I'm still not sure what she does. Appears to be a higher-level, but not top tier, government functionary. Lack of inline reference tags to help establish notability and the article is hard to read. Oaktree b ( talk) 03:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Maybe the blog is notable (and it feels like there's a bit of WP:COATRACK going on here), but this is not inherited by the individual. 1292simon ( talk) 08:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep If someone's notable, we should keep the article, and clean it up if necessary. At least I think it would benefit a relist to confirm sources like this (mentioning Jago's blog and readership) are on the same person and can help improve things. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- I think it is the same person.
scope_creep
Talk
17:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- The reason I listed it, is although there is plenty of coverage, and there is, Telgraph, Guardian, Independent, Vox, Foxnews, Spectator and on, its very much mentions of the blog, or his atheist stance. The book chapter is in-depth, and reliable and independent, a good bit there, but a single reference is insufficient to establish WP:BIO
- I think it is the same person.
scope_creep
Talk
17:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. There's just not a lot to be written about the subject with the given sources. Most mentions are passing, and the book chapters include him but don't say very much about him. Citing ( talk) 04:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.