The result was keep. Sandstein 18:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable film; fails WP:NFILM absent significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. DePRODed with the comment that the Jewish Chronicle review demonstrated notability, but that wouldn't be true (it's still both a NFILM and a GNG fail) even if the Jewish Chronicle had reviewed the film. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 03:44, 18 January 2012 (UTC) reply
*Keep per above.
SarahStierch (
talk) 19:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. Sandstein 18:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable film; fails WP:NFILM absent significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. DePRODed with the comment that the Jewish Chronicle review demonstrated notability, but that wouldn't be true (it's still both a NFILM and a GNG fail) even if the Jewish Chronicle had reviewed the film. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 03:44, 18 January 2012 (UTC) reply
*Keep per above.
SarahStierch (
talk) 19:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
reply