The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Jewish history This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Film: Canadian / Documentary / War This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force. This article is supported by the Documentary films task force. This article is supported by the War films task force. This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed. Palestine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Canada: Quebec / Montreal Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec. This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Low-importance).

The claims "The documentary presents footage of intolerance, hatred, militant censorship and use of violence by the Muslim students at the University campus to intimidate and suffocate any free discourse of opposing views." is not supported by the source cited [1]. Bless sins 13:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC) reply

I have thus made corrections to that paragraph adding the corresponding details presented in the reference.-- CltFn 00:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Can you please give a proper published reference for the Netanyahu quote. Thanks. Bless sins 18:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC) reply

There is nothing "dubious" with quotes from the documentary which is the subject of the article. Bless sins, stop spurious tagging of material that doesn't fit your political agenda. ← Humus sapiens ^{ну ?} 10:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC) reply

"political agenda"?? Your actions on wikipedia are going from bad to worse. Violating WP:Uncivil will not help anyone. In any case please provided a published and reliable source that actually quotes the documentary. Otherwise, the info is unsourced. Bless sins 18:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Nonsense. We even have {{ cite video}} for citations like that. ← Humus sapiens ^{ну ?} 23:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC) reply

So how can the quotes you have posted be verified? Am I expected to watch the entire documentary? What if it is hours long? Bless sins 15:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC) reply

(outdent) You assume good faith that the editor has watched the entire video and placed it properly. Otherwise, if cited, there is nothing stopping yoy from checking it out yourself. -- Avi 15:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC) reply

What if the video is hours long? Asking me to spend hours to verify a sentence (that I may easily miss) is ridiculous! Bless sins 01:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC) reply

The video is only 45 min long. No one asks you to watch it. BTW, CBSC panel link includes some of the interviews. ← Humus sapiens ^{ну ?} 01:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC) reply

"No one asks you to watch it". How else can I verify it? Bless sins 01:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC) reply

It's your problem. ← Humus sapiens ^{ну ?} 02:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC) reply

That doesn't cut it on wikipedia. If I source something to a book, I must provide the page number as well. WP says "For that reason, edits that rely on primary sources should only make descriptive claims that can be checked by anyone without specialist knowledge." [2] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bless sins ( talk • contribs) 02:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC). reply

Are you going to use the same argument to disrupt each of the hundreds of articles using {{ cite video}}, or only those you dislike? ← Humus sapiens ^{ну ?} 09:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights claimed that Netanyahu was guilty of war crimes and therefore should not be allowed a forum to vent his views on a publicly-funded campus. Whether or not you agree with them is besides the point. That is their claim.

Furthermore, several students from all parties were injured in the ruckus from batons and tear gas. Despite claims of protestors being "violent," smashed windows and minor property damage would hardly constitute as violence in the normal sense. All human injuries incurred that day were from police tactics.

The original ad for a protest, which you can still dig up online, called for protesting peacefully and for delivering an "arrest warrant" for his alleged war crimes

As well, Netanyahu had previously been denied the opportunity to speak at other institutions, such as UC Berkeley and Northwestern.

I type as a student of Concordia University and as someone who experienced the aftermath of the riot firsthand, as well as knowing people who attended the protest.

=//Turnquest 02:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC) reply

This article is about the documentary. The SPHR's claims, "arrest warrants", "original ads for a protest", grievances, excuses, etc. do not belong here. As for being "someone who experienced the aftermath", please review WP:COI. ← Humus sapiens ^{ну ?} 09:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC) reply

The word 'Polemics' has connotations of criticizing something holy or theological, which unfortunately this documentary does not fall under. I would suggest, if my addition of the word "criticism" does not work well, that "controversy" be used instead.

=//Turnquest 02:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I think "controversy" is too strong, but OK. The word you used, "Criticism" is not going to work because the decision of CBSC panel and Michael Grand's suggestions hardly qualify as such. ← Humus sapiens ^{ну ?} 03:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Confrontation at Concordia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120711055139/http://www.cbsc.ca/english/decisions/2004/040511appendixA.pdf to http://www.cbsc.ca/english/decisions/2004/040511appendixA.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928162032/http://www.jewishindependent.ca/archives/Aug03/archives03Aug22-03.html to http://www.jewishindependent.ca/archives/Aug03/archives03Aug22-03.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061004072635/http://www.friends.ca/News/Friends_News/archives/articles06290301.asp to http://friends.ca/News/Friends_News/archives/articles06290301.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050422193005/http://www.cbsc.ca/english/decisions/decisions/2004/040511.htm to http://www.cbsc.ca/english/decisions/decisions/2004/040511.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC) reply