The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
In light of the sources which were surfaced below, as well as improvements to sourcing to the article since this nomination, I withdraw claims of "unsourced" and "lack of notability". I am even tempted to withdraw the nomination entirely, but the promotional language inserted by the subject still seems to be a notable problem to me. Maybe draftify? Or delete without prejudice for recreation? I'm really not sure.
Melmann22:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment If the article is kept, I intend to continue working on it. Your major remaining criticism appears to be content-related: specifically the lack of NPOV via the earlier COI contributions. I am willing to reduce these non-encyclopaedic and promotional sections.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk)
10:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment I've done my bit. I believe it is more neutral and better sourced. Some content from COI contributor remains at about 10% but its tone has been checked by me to reduce promotional and unencyclopaedic tone. I'm moving on.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk)
03:06, 29 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep Multiple-award winner per
this, articles about or by artist
here, 62 works by artist
here. She was the featured subject of a broadcasts on ABC radio per
1,
2,
3,
4. The wp article certainly has issues both COI and poor and/or self-citing but the subject is nevertheless notable according to WP:MUSICBIO.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk)
11:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)11:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep A review of the sources cited and awards won indicate that this is a notable subject. These are enough to at least pass GNG.
Luciapop (
talk)
10:31, 26 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep as per
WP:HEY as the article has been significantly improved with extra content supported by significant coverage in multiple reliable sources so that
WP:GNG is passed. Also she has won multiple notable awards so that
WP:NMUSIC is also passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
01:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
In light of the sources which were surfaced below, as well as improvements to sourcing to the article since this nomination, I withdraw claims of "unsourced" and "lack of notability". I am even tempted to withdraw the nomination entirely, but the promotional language inserted by the subject still seems to be a notable problem to me. Maybe draftify? Or delete without prejudice for recreation? I'm really not sure.
Melmann22:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment If the article is kept, I intend to continue working on it. Your major remaining criticism appears to be content-related: specifically the lack of NPOV via the earlier COI contributions. I am willing to reduce these non-encyclopaedic and promotional sections.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk)
10:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment I've done my bit. I believe it is more neutral and better sourced. Some content from COI contributor remains at about 10% but its tone has been checked by me to reduce promotional and unencyclopaedic tone. I'm moving on.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk)
03:06, 29 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep Multiple-award winner per
this, articles about or by artist
here, 62 works by artist
here. She was the featured subject of a broadcasts on ABC radio per
1,
2,
3,
4. The wp article certainly has issues both COI and poor and/or self-citing but the subject is nevertheless notable according to WP:MUSICBIO.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk)
11:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)11:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep A review of the sources cited and awards won indicate that this is a notable subject. These are enough to at least pass GNG.
Luciapop (
talk)
10:31, 26 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep as per
WP:HEY as the article has been significantly improved with extra content supported by significant coverage in multiple reliable sources so that
WP:GNG is passed. Also she has won multiple notable awards so that
WP:NMUSIC is also passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
01:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.