The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 12:17, 22 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Casolari

Casolari (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quite unuseful disambiguation. 333 -blue 23:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply

• Comment. This looks like an incorrectly formatted surname page to me. It can be refactored very easily. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply
• Keep, it's actually a {{ surname}} page, useful for indexing people who have the same surname. I've cleaned it up a bit to put it more in line with MOS:APO. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 04:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply
• Keep as a now-properly-formatted surname page. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.