From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Less Unless ( talk) 17:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Callum Voisin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable teenager, who fails WP:NSPORTS. The GB3 Championship that he won is an amateur series, and as such is not professional. The F3 Championship is a semi-pro series and as such is also not fully professional. Most sources are promotional, others are passing mentions of where he placed in a given race. 2A01:36D:1200:4672:5406:9F58:AF4A:C4BC ( talk) 14:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Draftify. Two sentences in a listicle with 9 other young racers is not SIGCOV. Routine transactional announcements and event recaps on Formula Scout et al are not SIGCOV either. Much of the transactional content on these sites is regurgitated by semi-anonymous/pseudonymous contributors from press releases from places like Edge Sporting Management anyway. I'm doubtful there'll be more coverage in the next six months, but I guess we can wait and see.
JoelleJay ( talk) 05:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Two sentences in a listicle with 9 other young racers is not SIGCOV. Routine transactional announcements and event recaps on Formula Scout et al are not SIGCOV either. — Our job is to find sources, not to decide on the ones already listed in the article. This is categorically an improper application of the guideline. MSport1005 ( talk) 11:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Our job is to evaluate any sources that have been found. No one has provided additional sources that contain IRS SIGCOV, and nothing beyond routine and passing mentions showed up in my own search. NSPORT requires the subject meet GNG and that a GNG-qualifying source be identified for an article to be kept. JoelleJay ( talk) 19:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - There is no reason to delete this page, considering what happened in the 1st nomination and the fact that since that, Voisin has been crowned GB3 champion (which isn't an amateur series). Article's WP:Potential is fairly high considering his recent success and F3 drive for this year. Road Atlanta Turn 5 ( talk) 14:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - GB3 is a series that is well established within the alternate FIA pathway at around Formula Regional level. Therefore, someone calling it an amateur series is showing the whole motorsport community that they don't have the slightest idea on how the motorsport feeder series work. Therefore, its current champion who is also stepping up to FIA F3 cannot be considered as a "run of the mill" driver and is noticeable enough to be warranted inclusion in Wikipedia. Sjælefred Herm ( talk) 18:37, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • None of the above keep !votes have any P&G basis. It is irrelevant whether he raced amateur or pro because our notability guidelines require SIGCOV IRS sources for all sportspeople and so far none have been identified. JoelleJay ( talk) 19:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    Agreed. Please remember that polling is not a substitute for consensus. There still hasn't been any demonstration of WP:GNG being met or addressing of the WP:BLP concerns around the creation of articles about dubiously noteworthy WP:MINORS. A sportsperson being a professional or an amateur has little-to-no bearing on any of this. HumanBodyPiloter5 ( talk) 01:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    Voisin won't be a minor by the time he makes his F3 debut – I don't see the concern in an article that purely focuses on his racing career and not his personal life – and the GB3 title, AMABA finals appearance and F3 seat make him (at the very least) not WP:ROTM. He's certainly more notable than the likes of Kean Nakamura-Berta, René Lammers, William Macintyre, Rashid Al Dhaheri or Tiago Rodrigues, whose pages keep getting created – I had to draftify them all yesterday myself because nobody acts against them. MSport1005 ( talk) 02:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    Please, kindly stick to wiki etiquette and don't try to influence the flow of the discussion by discrediting everyone ("none of the above keep !votes [...]") who disagreed with you. The arguments go far deeper than "whether he raced amateur or pro". As stated (both above and in last year's nomination) a WP:BEFORE search yields enough non- routine SIGCOV – [1], [2], [3], [4] to name a few. And the subject is unequivocally more notable (or bears more WP:POTENTIAL) now than he was then. MSport1005 ( talk) 02:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    Thank you for providing those links. Search engines seem to be barely functional these days so it's really appreciated. The Autosport article counts towards WP:GNG although I'm less sure of the other examples. Formula Scout is a somewhat marginal source (I am unsure if it falls under WP:SPS) and I lack any familiarity with the other two. Regardless, I think on ethical grounds a high bar needs to be set with articles about young people who have not attracted much in the way of mainstream media coverage. HumanBodyPiloter5 ( talk) 02:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Passes GNG. Carrite ( talk) 21:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. The discussion is divided between those arguing Draftify and those who desire to Keep this a main space article. Since the dispute is over whether articles sources supply GNG and SIGCOV, a source analysis table would be useful in any one is interested in compiling one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep - per MSport1005 citations. I am not sure why this keeps getting relitigated when it already passed one add and the above discussion seems pretty clearly to have resulted in anothe keep. 108.41.198.35 ( talk) 00:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Less Unless ( talk) 17:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Callum Voisin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable teenager, who fails WP:NSPORTS. The GB3 Championship that he won is an amateur series, and as such is not professional. The F3 Championship is a semi-pro series and as such is also not fully professional. Most sources are promotional, others are passing mentions of where he placed in a given race. 2A01:36D:1200:4672:5406:9F58:AF4A:C4BC ( talk) 14:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Draftify. Two sentences in a listicle with 9 other young racers is not SIGCOV. Routine transactional announcements and event recaps on Formula Scout et al are not SIGCOV either. Much of the transactional content on these sites is regurgitated by semi-anonymous/pseudonymous contributors from press releases from places like Edge Sporting Management anyway. I'm doubtful there'll be more coverage in the next six months, but I guess we can wait and see.
JoelleJay ( talk) 05:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Two sentences in a listicle with 9 other young racers is not SIGCOV. Routine transactional announcements and event recaps on Formula Scout et al are not SIGCOV either. — Our job is to find sources, not to decide on the ones already listed in the article. This is categorically an improper application of the guideline. MSport1005 ( talk) 11:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Our job is to evaluate any sources that have been found. No one has provided additional sources that contain IRS SIGCOV, and nothing beyond routine and passing mentions showed up in my own search. NSPORT requires the subject meet GNG and that a GNG-qualifying source be identified for an article to be kept. JoelleJay ( talk) 19:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - There is no reason to delete this page, considering what happened in the 1st nomination and the fact that since that, Voisin has been crowned GB3 champion (which isn't an amateur series). Article's WP:Potential is fairly high considering his recent success and F3 drive for this year. Road Atlanta Turn 5 ( talk) 14:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - GB3 is a series that is well established within the alternate FIA pathway at around Formula Regional level. Therefore, someone calling it an amateur series is showing the whole motorsport community that they don't have the slightest idea on how the motorsport feeder series work. Therefore, its current champion who is also stepping up to FIA F3 cannot be considered as a "run of the mill" driver and is noticeable enough to be warranted inclusion in Wikipedia. Sjælefred Herm ( talk) 18:37, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • None of the above keep !votes have any P&G basis. It is irrelevant whether he raced amateur or pro because our notability guidelines require SIGCOV IRS sources for all sportspeople and so far none have been identified. JoelleJay ( talk) 19:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    Agreed. Please remember that polling is not a substitute for consensus. There still hasn't been any demonstration of WP:GNG being met or addressing of the WP:BLP concerns around the creation of articles about dubiously noteworthy WP:MINORS. A sportsperson being a professional or an amateur has little-to-no bearing on any of this. HumanBodyPiloter5 ( talk) 01:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    Voisin won't be a minor by the time he makes his F3 debut – I don't see the concern in an article that purely focuses on his racing career and not his personal life – and the GB3 title, AMABA finals appearance and F3 seat make him (at the very least) not WP:ROTM. He's certainly more notable than the likes of Kean Nakamura-Berta, René Lammers, William Macintyre, Rashid Al Dhaheri or Tiago Rodrigues, whose pages keep getting created – I had to draftify them all yesterday myself because nobody acts against them. MSport1005 ( talk) 02:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    Please, kindly stick to wiki etiquette and don't try to influence the flow of the discussion by discrediting everyone ("none of the above keep !votes [...]") who disagreed with you. The arguments go far deeper than "whether he raced amateur or pro". As stated (both above and in last year's nomination) a WP:BEFORE search yields enough non- routine SIGCOV – [1], [2], [3], [4] to name a few. And the subject is unequivocally more notable (or bears more WP:POTENTIAL) now than he was then. MSport1005 ( talk) 02:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    Thank you for providing those links. Search engines seem to be barely functional these days so it's really appreciated. The Autosport article counts towards WP:GNG although I'm less sure of the other examples. Formula Scout is a somewhat marginal source (I am unsure if it falls under WP:SPS) and I lack any familiarity with the other two. Regardless, I think on ethical grounds a high bar needs to be set with articles about young people who have not attracted much in the way of mainstream media coverage. HumanBodyPiloter5 ( talk) 02:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Passes GNG. Carrite ( talk) 21:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. The discussion is divided between those arguing Draftify and those who desire to Keep this a main space article. Since the dispute is over whether articles sources supply GNG and SIGCOV, a source analysis table would be useful in any one is interested in compiling one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep - per MSport1005 citations. I am not sure why this keeps getting relitigated when it already passed one add and the above discussion seems pretty clearly to have resulted in anothe keep. 108.41.198.35 ( talk) 00:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook