The result was delete. I see a rough consensus to delete this article which I have to honor...but this outcome seems surprising considering the previous AFD held two weeks ago which showed a great deal more support for this article. But Delete it is. Liz Read! Talk! 03:39, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
P.S. I have since found out that the most ardent article Keep supporter in the previous AFD was a paid editor who was compensated for writing this article. So, them being blocked had a clear effect on the outcome of this AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 03:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Not one reference in the first two blocks. They are all WP:SPS or interviews . scope_creep Talk 08:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
10:31, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a rough consensus to delete this article which I have to honor...but this outcome seems surprising considering the previous AFD held two weeks ago which showed a great deal more support for this article. But Delete it is. Liz Read! Talk! 03:39, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
P.S. I have since found out that the most ardent article Keep supporter in the previous AFD was a paid editor who was compensated for writing this article. So, them being blocked had a clear effect on the outcome of this AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 03:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Not one reference in the first two blocks. They are all WP:SPS or interviews . scope_creep Talk 08:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
10:31, 30 September 2022 (UTC)