The result was no consensus. This No consensus closure doesn't mean that this article can't be turned into a Redirect, it just won't be as a result of this AFD. Please discuss this possibility on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Bot-created article by bot Kotbot, operated by retired user Kotniski.
There is nothing visible at the location in the article. Lake Brzęczek does not appear to have anything built on its shores other than a few fishing jetties.
The article states that Brzęczek has a population of 5 people, however no source is given for this, either here or on the PL wiki article. I cannot find a listing for Brzęczek on the Polish statistical database where census data should be available (it collects data back to 1998 and the date given for this population in the PL wiki article is 2006).
The TERYT database, and the Polish regulation on place-names, both describe this as an osada (settlement) which are typically single buildings, and for which population statistics may not be collected. The nearest building I can find to the location given in the article is a forestry office for the forest of Jastrzębce, the address of which is given as being in "Jastrzębce" so I don't think this is the building referred to.
TL;DR - this place has no demonstrated population. Fails WP:GEOLAND, WP:GNG, WP:NOPAGE. No reasonable redirect - the name is simply the Polish word for "buzzer", which no-one would reasonably search looking for a random place in Poland. No accurate content to merge. FOARP ( talk) 08:22, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
19:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
23:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
User:Stok hasn't edited for several weeks and only has 53 edits on the English Wikipedia. I wouldn't wait for them to make your opinion final.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This No consensus closure doesn't mean that this article can't be turned into a Redirect, it just won't be as a result of this AFD. Please discuss this possibility on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Bot-created article by bot Kotbot, operated by retired user Kotniski.
There is nothing visible at the location in the article. Lake Brzęczek does not appear to have anything built on its shores other than a few fishing jetties.
The article states that Brzęczek has a population of 5 people, however no source is given for this, either here or on the PL wiki article. I cannot find a listing for Brzęczek on the Polish statistical database where census data should be available (it collects data back to 1998 and the date given for this population in the PL wiki article is 2006).
The TERYT database, and the Polish regulation on place-names, both describe this as an osada (settlement) which are typically single buildings, and for which population statistics may not be collected. The nearest building I can find to the location given in the article is a forestry office for the forest of Jastrzębce, the address of which is given as being in "Jastrzębce" so I don't think this is the building referred to.
TL;DR - this place has no demonstrated population. Fails WP:GEOLAND, WP:GNG, WP:NOPAGE. No reasonable redirect - the name is simply the Polish word for "buzzer", which no-one would reasonably search looking for a random place in Poland. No accurate content to merge. FOARP ( talk) 08:22, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
19:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
23:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
User:Stok hasn't edited for several weeks and only has 53 edits on the English Wikipedia. I wouldn't wait for them to make your opinion final.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)