- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Brielle LaCosta ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-relevant subject, not neutral article, weakly sourced, not organized properly { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 14:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC) - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contezza1 ( talk • contribs) 16:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC) There is absolutely no reason why this page should be deleted. She is a three-time pageant winner, has been honored by the State and is on the national advisory board for Autism. Why in the world would this page ever be deleted? I see you peg pageant winners, as you are doing to Miss NJ 2017 and do this same thing. A non-relevant subject? That's insane. ––––—″″keep″″——— I saw a Twitter post about this and came to check it out. LaCosta was named as one of the four most influential people in the state so I believe she deserves a page. She works hard to bring funding to Autism and brain cancer. She has spoken at Rutgers University on this topic. She sits on the NATIONAL board for Autism Radio and is regularly featured in New Jersey publications. She has 100,000 followers on Twitter alone that love reading her posts and blogs on a autism. There is no reason to delete this page. JohnScarrone ( talk) 00:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong delete Winning Miss New Jersey is not a sign of notability. Nor are any of her other accomplishments. Pageant winners at the US state level need to have coverage beyond routine coverage in the local press for such a win, and we see no such coverage here. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable titles, only minimal news coverage which hasn't been enough previously. --- PageantUpdater ( talk) 02:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This is the closest thing to a MySpace profile I've seen on Wikipedia in ages. Notability is not established by the sources provided, by quite a margin. Guy ( Help!) 14:39, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The coverage is almost entirely local which is not useful for GNG. In addition, the article is badly promotional. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 19:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - as my nomination. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Brielle LaCosta ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-relevant subject, not neutral article, weakly sourced, not organized properly { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 14:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC) - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contezza1 ( talk • contribs) 16:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC) There is absolutely no reason why this page should be deleted. She is a three-time pageant winner, has been honored by the State and is on the national advisory board for Autism. Why in the world would this page ever be deleted? I see you peg pageant winners, as you are doing to Miss NJ 2017 and do this same thing. A non-relevant subject? That's insane. ––––—″″keep″″——— I saw a Twitter post about this and came to check it out. LaCosta was named as one of the four most influential people in the state so I believe she deserves a page. She works hard to bring funding to Autism and brain cancer. She has spoken at Rutgers University on this topic. She sits on the NATIONAL board for Autism Radio and is regularly featured in New Jersey publications. She has 100,000 followers on Twitter alone that love reading her posts and blogs on a autism. There is no reason to delete this page. JohnScarrone ( talk) 00:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong delete Winning Miss New Jersey is not a sign of notability. Nor are any of her other accomplishments. Pageant winners at the US state level need to have coverage beyond routine coverage in the local press for such a win, and we see no such coverage here. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable titles, only minimal news coverage which hasn't been enough previously. --- PageantUpdater ( talk) 02:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This is the closest thing to a MySpace profile I've seen on Wikipedia in ages. Notability is not established by the sources provided, by quite a margin. Guy ( Help!) 14:39, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The coverage is almost entirely local which is not useful for GNG. In addition, the article is badly promotional. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 19:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - as my nomination. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.