The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Minor baseball player, no statement in the article which would be notable, even if accurately sourced. —
Arthur Rubin(talk) 03:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players.. as the team's first round pick he should be included somewhere as people will be searching for him. This is the best place to put him for now as he doesn't have enough for his own article.
Spanneraol (
talk) 12:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge per Spanneraol.--
Yankees10 22:43, 17 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge the Article looks like the best option. I watched the Article and have also rod the other user comment. I think the Article could merge with
Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players as other user said.
Forest90 (
talk) 12:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep passes GNG based on non-trivial coverage (ESPN, Charlotte Observer etc.) Subject is notable per
WP:NEXIST. Subject does not have to pass
WP:NBASEBALL and
WP:GNG. Only one or the other:
Comment I have added references, and will continue. Lubbad85 (
☎)(
Edits) 14:49, 24 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Being a first round draft pick and signing a contract are not relevant in this discussion.. baseball draft picks dont get the wide coverage that football and basketball ones do and sourcing looks pretty much routine to me.
Spanneraol (
talk) 15:40, 24 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge I don't see anything that shows he meets any WP notability criteria. Coverage is typical sports reporting, but a merge seems reasonable to me.
Papaursa (
talk) 23:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Minor baseball player, no statement in the article which would be notable, even if accurately sourced. —
Arthur Rubin(talk) 03:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players.. as the team's first round pick he should be included somewhere as people will be searching for him. This is the best place to put him for now as he doesn't have enough for his own article.
Spanneraol (
talk) 12:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge per Spanneraol.--
Yankees10 22:43, 17 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge the Article looks like the best option. I watched the Article and have also rod the other user comment. I think the Article could merge with
Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players as other user said.
Forest90 (
talk) 12:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep passes GNG based on non-trivial coverage (ESPN, Charlotte Observer etc.) Subject is notable per
WP:NEXIST. Subject does not have to pass
WP:NBASEBALL and
WP:GNG. Only one or the other:
Comment I have added references, and will continue. Lubbad85 (
☎)(
Edits) 14:49, 24 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Being a first round draft pick and signing a contract are not relevant in this discussion.. baseball draft picks dont get the wide coverage that football and basketball ones do and sourcing looks pretty much routine to me.
Spanneraol (
talk) 15:40, 24 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge I don't see anything that shows he meets any WP notability criteria. Coverage is typical sports reporting, but a merge seems reasonable to me.
Papaursa (
talk) 23:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.