The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Subject has collaborated with several different notable musicians, but there's no coverage of the subject beyond mere-mention. Does not meet
WP:MUSICBIO,
WP:GNG. Some of the songs that the subject has worked on have charted, but given that the subject is not the primary artist (and is not even mentioned on the chart), I don't believe this counts for much. Previously nominated to PROD, dePROD by initial editor who provided additional sources that were just more mere-mentions. signed, Rosguilltalk20:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
MUSICBIO mentions that it's a guideline for musicians or ensembles–that doesn't appear to include songwriters or producers. Going by Billboard, the song is
Troye Sivan's, not Inscore's. signed, Rosguilltalk22:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Very weak keep To be honest, I’m conflicted. I want to say Keep because at the very least he’s won a major award and has a Billboard appearance. But I’m staunch about deleting articles that rely on mere mentions no matter how reliable the source is. I lean keep though.
Trillfendi (
talk)
21:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Did the subject win the award though? Assuming we're talking about the ARIA award mentioned in the article,
ARIA appears to have only given the award to the main artist, Troye Sivan. The sources as given in the article actually don't even establish that the subject worked on the song that won the award, merely that they contributed to the album (alongside several other artists that are named). While there's likely liner notes establishing that Inscore did specifically work on that song somewhere, I think it's possibly a stretch to claim that the subject has won that award. Ultimately this is splitting hairs a bit, but I think it underscores why it's so important for article subjects to actually have in-depth coverage available, because otherwise we're basically just doing original research to figure out whether they deserve credit for the award or not. signed, Rosguilltalk22:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Wording of the article made it seem as if he did, upon further review. But I don’t know if ARIA works like the Grammys where everybody who worked on the song gets the award. So yeah the article is really hanging by a thread. He’s done notable work but is he notable? That is the question.
Trillfendi (
talk)
06:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Lots of hair splitting with the arguments in prior listings regarding being part of a team for an award winning song. Bottom line, though, the sources are all about about someone else. This subject is attempting to claim notability by association.
ShelbyMarion (
talk)
13:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Subject has collaborated with several different notable musicians, but there's no coverage of the subject beyond mere-mention. Does not meet
WP:MUSICBIO,
WP:GNG. Some of the songs that the subject has worked on have charted, but given that the subject is not the primary artist (and is not even mentioned on the chart), I don't believe this counts for much. Previously nominated to PROD, dePROD by initial editor who provided additional sources that were just more mere-mentions. signed, Rosguilltalk20:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
MUSICBIO mentions that it's a guideline for musicians or ensembles–that doesn't appear to include songwriters or producers. Going by Billboard, the song is
Troye Sivan's, not Inscore's. signed, Rosguilltalk22:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Very weak keep To be honest, I’m conflicted. I want to say Keep because at the very least he’s won a major award and has a Billboard appearance. But I’m staunch about deleting articles that rely on mere mentions no matter how reliable the source is. I lean keep though.
Trillfendi (
talk)
21:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Did the subject win the award though? Assuming we're talking about the ARIA award mentioned in the article,
ARIA appears to have only given the award to the main artist, Troye Sivan. The sources as given in the article actually don't even establish that the subject worked on the song that won the award, merely that they contributed to the album (alongside several other artists that are named). While there's likely liner notes establishing that Inscore did specifically work on that song somewhere, I think it's possibly a stretch to claim that the subject has won that award. Ultimately this is splitting hairs a bit, but I think it underscores why it's so important for article subjects to actually have in-depth coverage available, because otherwise we're basically just doing original research to figure out whether they deserve credit for the award or not. signed, Rosguilltalk22:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Wording of the article made it seem as if he did, upon further review. But I don’t know if ARIA works like the Grammys where everybody who worked on the song gets the award. So yeah the article is really hanging by a thread. He’s done notable work but is he notable? That is the question.
Trillfendi (
talk)
06:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Lots of hair splitting with the arguments in prior listings regarding being part of a team for an award winning song. Bottom line, though, the sources are all about about someone else. This subject is attempting to claim notability by association.
ShelbyMarion (
talk)
13:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.