From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Boldog (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · [1])
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Survived AfD's in 2006 and 2011 mostly because the works of the Tolkiens were considered to be enough to pass WP:GNG with nothing else to indicate notability. I turned the page into a disambiguation because there are two European municipalities named Boldog (and sending the orc article to List of Middle-earth characters but the disambiguation was undone with a note left on my talk page to get a consensus first. So I'm taking it here to AfD. Fails WP:GNG since there's no notability of this Boldog outside of the Tolkien works. Hog Farm ( talk) 04:04, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Delete — a minor character in a minor work. It seems really wrong that Wikipedia prioritises this fictional non-entity over two real municipalities.-- Jack Upland ( talk) 04:52, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - The article is pretty much entirely in-universe information about a very minor character, and while it may tenuously comply with WP:GNG because the subject gets some minor mentions in works summarizing Tolkien I think based on WP:PLOT it doesn't merit a stand-alone article. MDDevice talk 05:05, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:38, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:39, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 15:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Boldog (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · [1])
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Survived AfD's in 2006 and 2011 mostly because the works of the Tolkiens were considered to be enough to pass WP:GNG with nothing else to indicate notability. I turned the page into a disambiguation because there are two European municipalities named Boldog (and sending the orc article to List of Middle-earth characters but the disambiguation was undone with a note left on my talk page to get a consensus first. So I'm taking it here to AfD. Fails WP:GNG since there's no notability of this Boldog outside of the Tolkien works. Hog Farm ( talk) 04:04, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Delete — a minor character in a minor work. It seems really wrong that Wikipedia prioritises this fictional non-entity over two real municipalities.-- Jack Upland ( talk) 04:52, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - The article is pretty much entirely in-universe information about a very minor character, and while it may tenuously comply with WP:GNG because the subject gets some minor mentions in works summarizing Tolkien I think based on WP:PLOT it doesn't merit a stand-alone article. MDDevice talk 05:05, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:38, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:39, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 15:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook